fgiunchedi added a comment.
In T195121#4529715, @aborrero wrote:
In T195121#4527757, @fgiunchedi wrote:
Sounds like a nice project! With my swift maintainer hat on, testing a single 200-300 GB chunk of data sounds good to me. Let's coordinate though before uploading the full data set because swif
aborrero added a comment.
In T195121#4527757, @fgiunchedi wrote:
Sounds like a nice project! With my swift maintainer hat on, testing a single 200-300 GB chunk of data sounds good to me. Let's coordinate though before uploading the full data set because swift is pending its annual expansion (T2019
aborrero added a comment.
I just had a videoconf with people @abian and Ruben Ojeda from Wikimedia Spain.
Some conclusions:
IGN offers a lot of data, in many different formats. @abian or someone else should get an idea on how to post-process these files to a format understandable by Commons.
We
Reedy added a comment.
"It depends!"
On many things... Where the dataset is? How big is it? Does someone need to download it first, and then reupload it (and if so, what is their upload speed)? Or can they just get the files straight onto the disk at source...
If we can download it straight to wm
abian added a comment.
Thanks for your support, @aborrero and @SandraF_WMF! We hope to upload some of these series in 2018, so we'll have to choose the old but easily convertible style.
In T195121#4224564, @aborrero wrote:
Is it possible to do the processing by type (your first 3 points) instead
aborrero added a comment.
Hey, this is great news, since IGN is indeed a powerful source of data regarding geography, topology and mountains (which I love).
From the Wikimedia Cloud Services point of view, one thing we could offer is a Cloud VPS temporal project, where you can create one or two vi
