Epidosis added a comment.
Ongoing discussion about common.css at
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Common.css#Styling_Deprecated/Preferred_Ranks
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206392
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailprefer
SilentSpike added a comment.
To weigh in :
- Agree with the UX criticisms of colour and icon use for this.
- I don't agree with the tooltip content suggested above since it does not
accurately explain ranking. However, I do agree with the sentiment that
discoverability of ranking could
Bouzinac added a comment.
If I were to choose, I would deprecate the watermarks solution ;)
Color on backgound + color on classic button icon would be great enough!
Besides, I don't understand the third icon on this image
"https://phab.wmfusercontent.org/file/data/5cc6pk4joa6am4fsgveh/PHI
ChristianKl added a comment.
Ordering is generally useful (but can create issues as pointed out by
@MichaelSchoenitzer) but it doesn't help a user to understand the concept of
deprecated statements and why we have wrong data on Wikidata that we mark as
deprecated.
The ordering issues coul
MathTexLearner added a comment.
Hello. I want to make you aware of the solution proposed by ChristianKl in
the project chat here:
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata%3AProject_chat&type=revision&diff=1271399554&oldid=1271369787
Basically it involves:
- bolding the
MichaelSchoenitzer added a comment.
I would like to see the ordering being implemented and I share the doubts on
the use of colors. But I want to point out that just sorting the values by rank
will only solve half of this problem. It will make it easier for people to see
which statements hav