jhsoby added a comment.
I was going to say the same as @Mahir256: We use xx-x-Q### tags only when
there is no valid BCP47 code available for use (in MediaWiki), but using the
proper codes is definitely preferable to these private use codes. So these
codes seem like perfectly good additions
Mahir256 added a comment.
@Amire80 To my knowledge it is not mandated anywhere that all variants of the
representation of a lexeme lemma/form must use Q number private use subtags,
but rather such uses are possible if other existing subtags within BCP47 cannot
adequately indicate the
Amire80 added a comment.
Shouldn't it be like in Hebrew, where the same lexeme has a default spelling
(probably the same as ja-jpan) and variants identified by Q numbers?
I'm not really opposed to it, but what's the advantage of ja-hira, etc.?
TASK DETAIL
Mbch331 added subscribers: Amire80, jhsoby, Mbch331.
Mbch331 added a comment.
@jhsoby @Amire80 Any objections from your side?
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T262330
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Mbch331
Cc:
Mahir256 created this task.
Mahir256 added a project: Wikidata Lexicographical data.
Restricted Application added a project: Wikidata.
TASK DESCRIPTION
These are all codes for the representations of Japanese lexemes and forms
with ISO 15924 codes (albeit lowercased) for Hiragana, Katakana, a
