On 4 April 2013 22:23, Michael Hale hale.michael...@live.com wrote:
trench, then I just want to update it on Wikidata, and then every article
that references it will be updated. I don't want to have to update it on
Wikidata and then go do a null edit on every article that uses that
Le 2013-04-05 09:32, Gregor Hagedorn a écrit :
On 4 April 2013 22:23, Michael Hale hale.michael...@live.com wrote:
trench, then I just want to update it on Wikidata, and then every
article
that references it will be updated. I don't want to have to update
it on
Wikidata and then go do a null
My concern is, that the Wikidata editors, those not with random
editing behavior, but those who are curators/caretakers of specific
pages, experience a disempowerment, because they loose control.
I view the decision to inform about wikidata changes only in the
short-lived recentchanges, but not
On 05/04/13 16:00, Lukas Benedix wrote:
* when no text is available in the users language the statement section
looks like this:
http://lbenedix.monoceres.uberspace.de/screenshots/mejpee0fxi_(2013-04-05_15.34.41).png
The thing to remember is that the history of a page is the history of the wiki
markup for the page, not the history of the rendered HTML. It would be
misleading if edits were shown in the markup history for an article each time a
template or Wikidata item changed because reverting the markup to
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Michael Hale hale.michael...@live.com wrote:
The thing to remember is that the history of a page is the history of the
wiki markup for the page, not the history of the rendered HTML. It would be
misleading if edits were shown in the markup history for an article
Oh, nice.
From: lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 20:07:44 +0200
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Page history and properties
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Michael Hale hale.michael...@live.com wrote:
The thing to remember is that the
On 5 April 2013 20:05, Michael Hale hale.michael...@live.com wrote:
The thing to remember is that the history of a page is the history of the
wiki markup for the page, not the history of the rendered HTML. It would be
misleading if edits were shown in the markup history for an article each
Well, I could make a view that shows the diff of a Wikipedia article stacked on
top of the diff for the corresponding Wikidata item on my computer in a few
minutes. But diffs can be very long sometimes, so there would be a lot of
discussion about whether that view is more appropriate than just
On 5 April 2013 21:41, Michael Hale hale.michael...@live.com wrote:
Well, I could make a view that shows the diff of a Wikipedia article stacked
on top of the diff for the corresponding Wikidata item on my computer in a
few minutes. But diffs can be very long sometimes, so there would be a lot
So you agree that it is more important to reduce clutter than to add
functionality that very few people use? They used to save backups of the HTML
versions of pages, but they stopped 5 years ago because it's not worth the
extra overhead for something so few people use.
On 5 April 2013 23:19, Michael Hale hale.michael...@live.com wrote:
So you agree that it is more important to reduce clutter than to add
functionality that very few people use?
No, I strongly disagree with this. I think the functionality of being
able to curate the page Wikipedia editors care
But you do agree that it is easier to curate articles by updating one value in
a database than updating the value separately everywhere it appears?
From: g.m.haged...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:45:10 +0200
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Page history and
Heya folks :)
Here's your summary of what happened around Wikidata over the last week.
= Development =
* The first year is over. Thank you everyone for being amazing and
helping to build Wikidata and making it more than we could possibly
have hoped for already. 3
* Put a lot of work into
On 5 April 2013 23:53, Michael Hale hale.michael...@live.com wrote:
But you do agree that it is easier to curate articles by updating one value
in a database than updating the value separately everywhere it appears?
Absolutely.
But in my experience Wikipedia editors care about the product of a
15 matches
Mail list logo
