Re: [Wikidata-l] supported and planned wikidata uris( was Re:Meta header for asserting that a web page is about a Wikidata subject)

2014-02-27 Thread Michael Smethurst
hello On 27/02/2014 08:44, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote: Hi, On 26/02/14 22:40, Michael Smethurst wrote: Hello *Really* not meaning to jump down any http-range-14 rabbit holes but wasn't there a plan for wikidata to have uris representing things and pages about those

[Wikidata-l] supported and planned wikidata uris( was Re:Meta header for asserting that a web page is about a Wikidata subject)

2014-02-26 Thread Michael Smethurst
Hello *Really* not meaning to jump down any http-range-14 rabbit holes but wasn't there a plan for wikidata to have uris representing things and pages about those things? From conversations on this list I sketched a picture a while back of all the planned URIs:

Re: [Wikidata-l] Data values

2012-12-20 Thread Michael Smethurst
Not quite on topic but on the subject of uncertainty around dates I've worked with a couple of data sets where birth and death dates were unknown but activity periods [1] were known. These have either had a separate flag called is_flourished (or similar) used to modify born / died or separate

Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata links

2012-07-26 Thread Michael Smethurst
Very delayed reply but think I'm still confused on this. Made a picture to clear my mind but not sure it works: http://smethur.st/wikidata The bit I think I get: If I request http://en.wikidata.org/wiki/Berlin Or http://en.wikidata.org/title/Berlin I get a 301? to:

Re: [Wikidata-l] DBpedia usage in the bbc

2012-07-04 Thread Michael Smethurst
of sources they accept. Etc. (Actually, decide is too nice a word for the process I expect will unfold... ) We will keep the problems you mentioned in mind, and I fully think that we will improve on every single one of them. Look forward to seeing it unfold :-) 2012/7/3 Michael Smethurst