On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Antoine Isaac ais...@few.vu.nl wrote:
Hi Lydia (and congrats!!)
Thanks!
I don't remember the specifics of the Commons issue, I was not really in it
(I cc my colleague David Haskiya to correct me if I'm writing too much
crap). But basically I think it was
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Antoine Isaac ais...@few.vu.nl wrote:
Hello Denny,
I think we in Europeana had the same problem in the GLAMwiki toolset project
[1].
We wanted to submit the metadata we had for Europeana objects to be uploaded
in Commons, but that was not fully possible... So
This is completely up to the community, whether they want this data and the
necessary structures for it. It really depends on the scope of the dataset.
But here it is the same: there is no way to use this data in short-term for
the metadata in Commons. This will be possible in a few months, if you
Am 25.09.2013 14:06, schrieb Lydia Pintscher:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Antoine Isaac ais...@few.vu.nl wrote:
Hello Denny,
I think we in Europeana had the same problem in the GLAMwiki toolset project
[1].
We wanted to submit the metadata we had for Europeana objects to be uploaded
in
2013/9/25 Antoine Isaac ais...@few.vu.nl:
Hello Denny,
I think we in Europeana had the same problem in the GLAMwiki toolset project
[1].
We wanted to submit the metadata we had for Europeana objects to be uploaded
in Commons, but that was not fully possible... So we'd have to think of an
hi,
we are currently experimenting to have, after zb zürich earlier the
year[1], a second museum from switzerland uploading full quality
images (i.e. tif format)[2]. i was wondering what is the most
wikidata compatible way of adding a creator information to an image
like this one:
