wrote:
> > I think you want it to be "Popular print". I changed it for you.
> > http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1306119
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_print
> >
> >> From: rupert.thur...@gmail.com
> >> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:29:24 +010
ive.com
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:56:55 -0400
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] is there a "schema" for the claims of a libraries
collection ?
Will this information eventually be able to replace the article categorization
system?
> From: andrew.g...@du
Will this information eventually be able to replace the article categorization
system?
> From: andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:21:04 +
> To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] is there a "schema" for the claims of a l
rch 2013 06:01, Michael Hale wrote:
> I think you want it to be "Popular print". I changed it for you.
> http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1306119
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_print
>
>> From: rupert.thur...@gmail.com
>> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:29:24 +01
-l] is there a "schema" for the claims of a libraries
> collection ?
>
> hi,
>
> i am not even sure if i use the right vocabulary here, but is there
> some "schema" for claims or statements of a libraries collection? i
> wanted to add a type,
hi,
i am not even sure if i use the right vocabulary here, but is there
some "schema" for claims or statements of a libraries collection? i
wanted to add a type, and ended up linking it to "collection". the
translation then revealed that it is from horses dressage
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25
