Yes, I agree that statements (or claims) about properties would be useful.
In fact, this is something I hope to see on the road map for 2014.
-- daniel
Am 15.01.2014 13:54, schrieb Lukas Benedix:
> It would be nice to have statements about properties.
>
> Property:P107 -> isDeprecated -> "True"
It would be nice to have statements about properties.
Property:P107 -> isDeprecated -> "True"
That would also make it easier to claim some "constraints" for properties:
Property:P21 -> validValue -> Q6581097
Property:P21 -> validValue -> Q6581072
Property:P21 -> validValue -> Q1097630
Property:P2
Perhaps properties could be marked as deprecated, that is the Pxx and not
the values in Qxx, and then published as part og the entity data. That
would make any upcoming change detectable for reusers.
It would also make it necessary to have some kind og delayed process on
deletions, but that should
On 10/01/14 03:21, emw wrote:
What about monthly/dump-based aggregated property usage statistics?
Property usage statistics would be very valuable, Dimitris. It would
help inform community decisions about how to steer changes in property
usage with less disruption. It would have other sig
>
> What about monthly/dump-based aggregated property usage statistics?
>
Property usage statistics would be very valuable, Dimitris. It would help
inform community decisions about how to steer changes in property usage
with less disruption. It would have other significant benefits as well.
Get
What about monthly/dump-based aggregated property usage statistics?
People would be able to check property trends or maybe subscribe to
specific properties via rss.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Daniel Kinzler
wrote:
> Am 08.01.2014 16:20, schrieb Thomas Douillard:
> > Hi, a problem seems (no
Am 08.01.2014 16:20, schrieb Thomas Douillard:
> Hi, a problem seems (not very surprisingly) to emerge into Wikidata : the
> managing of the evolution of how we do things on Wikidata.
>
> Properties are deleted, which made some consumer of the datas sometimes a
> little
> frustrated they are not
On 08/01/14 16:57, Denny Vrandecic wrote:
I am afraid that keeping versions is something the current architecture
will be terrible at supporting, especially because we need to keep
snapshots over a multitude of pages. MediaWiki is not terribly good at
that. If something like the memento extension
I am afraid that keeping versions is something the current architecture
will be terrible at supporting, especially because we need to keep
snapshots over a multitude of pages. MediaWiki is not terribly good at
that. If something like the memento extension would really work at scale,
maybe...
Anyw
Hi, a problem seems (not very surprisingly) to emerge into Wikidata : the
managing of the evolution of how we do things on Wikidata.
Properties are deleted, which made some consumer of the datas sometimes a
little frustrated they are not informed of that and could not take part of
the discussion.
10 matches
Mail list logo
