Gerard how do you, within wikidata, properly handle the case where an
article is there on enwp, and a paragraph and a redirect to it is there on
dewp?
Rupert
On Oct 18, 2014 1:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
As you correctly quote, one of the requirements is an
Hoi,
We do not support redirects. We do not support paragraphs.Wikidata is not
designed to support either.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 October 2014 10:39, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard how do you, within wikidata, properly handle the case where an
article is there on
Well actually, we *do* support redirects. One just has to be a bit
crafty in how one creates them.
Do you have a problem with that?
If so, what is your problem?
-- James.
On 20/10/2014 11:45, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
We do not support redirects. We do not support paragraphs.Wikidata
With articles it is obvious. The subject matter that will be provided IS what
is advertised. This is NOT the case with re-directs. They point to somewhere
arbitrary and there is no way to ensure that the redirect remains consistent
and fits the subject of the Wikidata item well.
I've seen
Just realized that I was not actually caught up but
replying to a message from a few days ago. Sorry if
the discussion has moved on. .
Thank you,
Derric Atzrott
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
There are major problems using redirects as sitelinks. The top one is
that they do not always point to the concept they should, and even if
they do, there is no guarantee that this redirect will keep pointing
to the same place (normally to a section of another article), since
the section
Hey folks :)
Here's your weekly dose of Wikidata updates:
Discussions
- Do you want to see constraint violation reports and referencing
improved? Please provide input
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata-l/2014-October/004778.html
.
Events
Another thing that I am seeing now is that parsoid plans to add IDs to all
elements:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Parsoid/MediaWiki_DOM_spec/Element_IDs
I don't know enough about it to see if those element IDs could be used as
section identifiers, but it might be well worth to ask about it.
Hoi,
I am totally happy for Wikipedia to have redirects. I do not mind as long
as it stops there,.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 October 2014 22:24, James Heald j.he...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
I think we have to look at what people actually use: overwhelmingly, that
is redirects, not labelled section
On 19 October 2014 22:11, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
No James, redirects do not have templates or categories
Yes, they do.
See, for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:R_from_relative
as used on, for example:
I'm thinking of possible ways to represent constraints as items (see [1]),
like those in: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P19
However some of these are not easy to translate into Wikidata proper. For
example:
place of birth (P19) Conflicts with instance of (P31): criminal delict
11 matches
Mail list logo
