Hi Andreas,
thanks for the input. I have drafted the current text about geo-related
datatypes, but I am far from being an expert in this area. Our mapping
expert in Wikidata is Katie (Aude), who has also been working with
OpenStreetMap, but further expert input on this topic would be quite
Hey again,
getting over wasn't meant to be harsh. I was hoping though wiki in
Wikidata stands for a the broader concept of free and open, and
not a particular syntax for encoding knowledge.
I'm all for free and open knowledge, but I think sticking to the same
mechanisms which helped bootstrap
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Martynas Jusevicius
marty...@graphity.org wrote:
Hey again,
getting over wasn't meant to be harsh. I was hoping though wiki in
Wikidata stands for a the broader concept of free and open, and
not a particular syntax for encoding knowledge.
I'm all for free and
Martynas,
what you are proposing below is not W3C recommended RDF but an extension
of triples to quads. As far as I know, this extension is not compatible
yet with existing standards such as SPARQL and OWL. Named graphs work
with SPARQL, but are mostly used in another way than you suggest.
Binàris,
then you should coin a crystal clear definition of snak (could it be
made an acronym?) everyone can memorize and understand. Sounds also
as snap and snag. If you find a pun it would help it get accepted.
jfc
At 10:39 06/04/2012, Bináris wrote:
2012/4/5 Gregor Hagedorn
Hi All,
I just wanted to make sure folks had seen this paper by Eytan Adar, Michael
Skinner, and Daniel Weld (big names in AI). It's precisely about aligning
infoboxes and propagating information across multiple language editions, so it
might help guide the process when we get to that stage
On 06.04.2012 14:28, Martynas Jusevicius wrote:
Hey again,
getting over wasn't meant to be harsh. I was hoping though wiki in
Wikidata stands for a the broader concept of free and open, and
not a particular syntax for encoding knowledge.
Dear Martynas
As stated in the proposal, we do not
