I like it and I think it will be readable for many non-technical
Wikipedians.
--
Bináris
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
"You do not need the full expressive power of SPARQL or graph
querying" -- what kind of query mechanism is Wikidata planning to
support in later stages? I don't suppose the data model will be
redesigned for that? So in that case you have to have queries in mind
from the start of its design.
Regard
Hi folks!
Here's the summary of what happened in Wikidata during the last week.
The wiki version is here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Status_updates/2012_06_22
= Development =
* More work on auto entries in the revision history for data edits
* Worked on replacing interlanguage and in
Dear Martynas,
as far as I understand it, Wikidata will not need to worry about named
graphs or alike.
IIRC Wikidata is building a fast software to edit facts and generate
infoboxes. You do not need the full expressive power of SPARQL or graph
querying.
That is a different use case and can be d
It says "deprecated" on the Data model wiki.
So maybe Wikidata doesn't need statement-level granularity? Maybe the named
graph approach is good enough? But it's not based on statements.
If you build this kind of data model on the relational, not to mention
provenance, you will not be able to prov
Denny didn't even use the word "deprecated".
Reification for statement-level provenance works, but you won't be able
to sell it as an elegant solution to the problem.
So "could" - yes , "should" - ?? - probably not
If Wikidata is using statement-level provenance, there might be better
ways to
Denny, the statement-level of granularity you're describing is achieved by
RDF reification. You describe it however as a "deprecated mechanism" of
provenance, without backing it up.
Why do you think there must be a better mechanism? Maybe you should take
another look at reification, or lower your
Hello,
On 2012-06-20 16:51, Friedrich Röhrs wrote:
I have to say i find the story board really confusing. If I click on
add language links i would assume to get some sort of form where i can
add/remove/edit language links that will be shown on the left. I have
to however choose only 1 language a
Here's the use case:
Every statement in Wikidata will have a URI. Every statement can have
one more references.
In many cases, the reference might be text on a website.
Whereas it is always possible (and probably what we will do first) as
well as correct to state:
Statement1 accordingTo SlashDot
We are working on the RDF export draft. We will not extend RDF in any
way, but use it to express the model in its entirety. We will post to
this list once this is drafted.
Cheers,
Denny
2012/6/22 Paul A. Houle :
> On 6/20/2012 6:39 AM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>> Heya folks :)
>>
>> We've published
10 matches
Mail list logo
