Re: [Wikidata-l] DBpedia usage in the bbc Re: DBpedia usage in the bbc - selected highlights - selected highlights
Re: [Wikidata-l] DBpedia usage in the bbc - selected highlights ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Re: [Wikidata-l] DBpedia usage in the bbc
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Gregor Hagedorn g.m.haged...@gmail.comwrote: In my observation, numeric-URI-based systems like Drupal tend to have minimal Links inside their content pages (i.e. beyond the menu system), mediawiki-based system tend to have hundreds of links inside their content. I believe this is so because links inside Drupal pages usually point to something like http://drupal.org/node/21947/ which makes it impossible for humans to easily check whether this is an intentional or erroneous link. This is off-topic, but for Drupal this is a configuration issue. One of the early lessons in books and tutorial series is how to configure this, and many Drupal sites are configured to use human-readable paths. Drupal.org is not because it has millions of nodes which often change names. You are correct that most Drupal sites have fewer internal links than wikis, but I think that holds for Drupal sites that are configured to use human-readable paths as well. The cause is more likely in a different interface issue. I don't mean to spin this out into a tangent about Drupal, just wanted to point out that correlation doesn't imply causation in this case. -Lin -- Lin Clark Drupal Consultant lin-clark.com twitter.com/linclark ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Re: [Wikidata-l] DBpedia usage in the bbc
I don't mean to spin this out into a tangent about Drupal. Me neither, my discussion point here is: There are advantages for opaque (like http:something.org/node123456) and nonopaque (http:something.org/Bonn,_Northrhine-Westfalia,_Germany) URI/IRI identifiers. In the light of the use-case of interlinking discussed here: which is right for Wikidata? Does Wikidata need both in parallel (I believe this is the current plan)? Gregor ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Re: [Wikidata-l] DBpedia usage in the bbc
Yes, we are planning to do both in parallel, as this page explains: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/URI_scheme Cheers, Denny 2012/7/5 Gregor Hagedorn g.m.haged...@gmail.com: I don't mean to spin this out into a tangent about Drupal. Me neither, my discussion point here is: There are advantages for opaque (like http:something.org/node123456) and nonopaque (http:something.org/Bonn,_Northrhine-Westfalia,_Germany) URI/IRI identifiers. In the light of the use-case of interlinking discussed here: which is right for Wikidata? Does Wikidata need both in parallel (I believe this is the current plan)? Gregor ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l -- Project director Wikidata Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
