never mind - the previous note had a link. thanks
On 01.02.2013
16:30, jmccl...@hypergrove.com wrote:
> Hi - Where can i see the
rdfs/owl definition for o:Statement?
>
> thanks - john
>
> On
01.02.2013 12:09, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
>
>> On 01.02.2013 14:54,
Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
>>
>
Hi - Where can i see the rdfs/owl definition for o:Statement?
thanks - john
On 01.02.2013 12:09, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> On
01.02.2013 14:54, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
>
>> While the reification
makes sense, we thought that it looked a bit too much like
rdf:Statement. w:Berlin s:Population
On 01.02.2013 14:54, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
> While the reification makes sense, we thought that it looked a bit too
> much like rdf:Statement.
>
> w:Berlin s:Population Berlin:Statement1 .
>
> Berlin:Statement1 rdf:type o:Statement .
>
>
>
> Perhaps you could rename o:Statement to o:Fact ins
Hello,
My colleague Yves Raimond and myself were just having a quick chat about
the Wikidata RDF serialisation plans.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Development/RDF
While the reification makes sense, we thought that it looked a bit too
much like rdf:Statement.
w:Berlin s:Population Be
Heya folks :)
Here's your summary of what happened around Wikidata over the last week.
The wiki version is at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Status_updates/2013_02_01
= Development =
* Deployment on the Hebrew and Italian Wikipedia
(http://blog.wikimedia.de/2013/01/30/wikidata-coming-to
ow people are
running across the language specific ones.
> Re first mail: is there not a plain wd as well (for www.wikidata?) or a
> www.wd?
Yes, there are lots :-)
curl --silent
'http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2013/2013-02/pagecounts-20130201-090
No, not by design.
The design would be to have
http://en.wikidata.org/wiki/Breck
be an alias for
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123803
but we didn't have yet the time to set this up properly.
If anyone knows Apache well and has some time on their hands, please ping
me on IRC.
Right now, they
Yes, I'm just noticing that there are, for example:
http://de.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123803
http://en.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123803
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123803
Which are identical. Is this by design?
//Ed
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:15 AM, swuensch wrote:
> maybe the statistic is splitted
maybe the statistic is splitted up by the viewerlanguage.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Ed Summers wrote:
> Diederek van Liere over on the analytics list [1] let me know that
> webstatscollector was updated to start collecting wikidata stats as of
> Feb 1st UTC 0:00. Yay.
>
> I took a look, a
Diederek van Liere over on the analytics list [1] let me know that
webstatscollector was updated to start collecting wikidata stats as of
Feb 1st UTC 0:00. Yay.
I took a look, and I was a bit confused by the language prefixes, for example:
de.wd Wikidata:Hauptseite 14 369565
de.wd Wikidata:Introd
10 matches
Mail list logo
