I am completely amazed by a particularly brilliant way that Wikipedia uses
Wikidata. Instead of simply displaying the data from Wikidata and removing
the local data, a template and workflow is proposed, which...
* grabs the relevant data from Wikidata
* compares it with the data given locally in
Do projects need to explicitly enable Phase 2 or is that on by default? Is
there a way to check this?
2013/4/25 Dario Taraborelli dtarabore...@wikimedia.org
Kudos to the team on hitting this big milestone!
On Apr 24, 2013, at 12:08 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations :)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Jan Kučera kozuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Do projects need to explicitly enable Phase 2 or is that on by default? Is
there a way to check this?
It is enabled on all Wikipedias.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Community
Hello All ,
i'm planning to write a proposal for WikiData to DBpedia project in GSoC2013
i've found in the change propagation
paghttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Change_propagatione
:
Support for 3rd party clients, that is, client wikis and other consumers
outside of Wikimedia, is
Hello Dimirtis
what do you thing of that ?
shall i write this part as an abstract part in the proposal and wait for
more details ,
or could we have a smiliar plan like the one already implemented in dbpedia
http://wiki.dbpedia.org/DBpediaLive#h156-3
thanks
regards
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at
Well, PubSubHubbub is a nice idea. However it clearly depends on two
factors:
1. whether Wikidata sets up such an infrastructure (I need to check
whether we have capacities, I am not sure atm)
2. whether performance is good enough to handle high-volume publishers
Basically, polling to recent
