On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Cristian Consonni
wrote
>
> Quick question, the file says that in Wikidata there are:
> 1276758 items link it.wiki, but it.wiki has "only"
> 1066230 articles
> So there are many (~210k) Wikidata items pointing to non-article
> pages? Or maybe there is some double
2013/9/24 Luca Martinelli :
> 2013/9/24 Magnus Manske :
>> https://tools.wmflabs.org/magnustools/static_data/items_per_site.20130924.tab
>>
>> SQL query used:
>> select ips_site_id,count(*) from wb_items_per_site group by ips_site_id
>>
>> For a list of all
What about alcohol-free beer?
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
On Sep 24, 2013 3:49 PM, "Andrea Zanni" wrote:
> Not sure if I udnerstood it well, but this could be a counterexample:
>
> Beer (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q44) is a subclass of Alcoholic
> beverage (htt
2013/9/24 Magnus Manske :
> For now:
> https://tools.wmflabs.org/magnustools/static_data/items_per_site.20130924.tab
>
> SQL query used:
> select ips_site_id,count(*) from wb_items_per_site group by ips_site_id
>
> For a list of all items with these links, now that might be a
For now:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/magnustools/static_data/items_per_site.20130924.tab
SQL query used:
select ips_site_id,count(*) from wb_items_per_site group by ips_site_id
For a list of all items with these links, now that might be a little long
to put in an attachment...
On Tue, Sep 24
Luca Martinelli, 24/09/2013 19:40:
Hi all,
sorry if I burst in with a simple question, but... is there a tool to
count how many sitelinks for a single project are there in Wikidata?
I mean, if I want to know how many (and which) items in Wikidata have
a sitelink to, say, Yoruba Wikipedia, what
Hi all,
sorry if I burst in with a simple question, but... is there a tool to
count how many sitelinks for a single project are there in Wikidata?
I mean, if I want to know how many (and which) items in Wikidata have
a sitelink to, say, Yoruba Wikipedia, what tool do I have to use, if
exists?
Th
Hoi,
When you read about upper ontologies, it says that the answer is highly
political. We have already suffered the pain of using the DNB library
system. For all our items with a GND identifier we can lookup what the
"main type (GND)" is. We have identifiers to many external sources and for
all
This is really useful, thanks Magnus, otherwise I thought I was going to have
to put Wikidata in RAM myself.
Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
+17074787023
From: wikidata-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
on behalf of Magnus Manske
Sent: Tuesday, Sep
This:
http://208.80.153.172/api?q=claim[279]&props=279
will give you all the items that have the "subclass of" property, and the
respective item they are a subclass of. Enough to make a subclass tree for
all of Wikidata.
You'll have to get the labels and page counts yourself ;-)
On Tue, Sep 24
I would be surprised if that theory held true. I expect that both very
abstract (fruit) and extremely specific (golden delicious) items would have
a lower sitelink count than the "golden layer of most useful terms" (apple)
in the hierarchy (I am reminded of the theory of word length and term
freque
Tom,
I totally agree with your sentiments here. Two questions.
Do you believe there is any valuable use for upper ontologies in the
wikidata system at all at this stage?
Could you describe how you see a bubble-up classification scheme working in
this context in a little detail? I can imagine s
Not sure if I udnerstood it well, but this could be a counterexample:
Beer (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q44) is a subclass of Alcoholic
beverage (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q154)
Beer: 142 links
Alcoholic beverage: 73 links
Aubrey
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Klein,Max wrote:
> Hel
On 22 September 2013 at 21:24:48, Antoine Isaac (ais...@few.vu.nl) wrote:
First, getting a clean hierarchy won't make things easier, if you end up with a
too static/formal view on the world. Second, the feeling about the W3C
recommendations is wrong. W3C has actually pushed SKOS to allow 'softer
14 matches
Mail list logo
