On 29/05/14 21:04, Andrew Gray wrote:
One other issue to bear in mind: it's *simple* to have properties as a
separate thing. I have been following this discussion with some
interest but... well, I don't think I'm particularly stupid, but most
of it is completely above my head.
Saying here are
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
wrote:
One other issue to bear in mind: it's *simple* to have properties as a
separate thing. I have been following this discussion with some
interest but... well, I don't think I'm particularly stupid, but most
of it is
And to summarize the answer of the original question to future readers. The
point of properties is:
a) to help humans to better understand Wikidata
b) to help programmers (also humans :P) build the software running it
c) to make a distinction between concepts found in the world and the
concepts
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
Do we have an easy way of highlighting a gallery of good examples or even a
plain wikipage of topical guidance? Would be very useful if we could say
'here's a politician, here's a French city, etc'
Simple tables that are in wikipedia:
* league tables with columns for games won, drawn, lost, goals for, goals
against, points, rank and rows for each of the teams in the league.
* election results with columns for votes for each party and seats won by
each party and rows for each region, state
