-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:55:28 +
John Lewis wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Some exciting news here. The Open Data Awards' finalists lists were
> recently published on their website. Wikidata has been listed as a
> finalist in two different categories
I don't know because I'm not the developer of the app and my knowledge is
limited in this area. For many years now, I am collecting data
(information, photo, coordinates) about the cemetery. I've publish
everything on Commons, Wikidata and OSM, so developers can do something
smart with that ;)
Pyb
Am 28.10.2014 11:26, schrieb Martynas Jusevičius:
> And why do you think practical cases cannot be implemented using RDF?
> What is the justification for ignoring the whole standard and
> implementation stack? What makes you think Wikidata can do better than
> RDF?
We don't ignore the standard, bu
That's a great idea!
Just curious, for such a specific use case, why did you go for an App
instead of a Website?
On Tue Oct 28 2014 at 7:29:22 AM Sjoerd de Bruin
wrote:
> Not available in the Dutch iTunes Store...
>
> Op 28 okt. 2014 om 15:26 heeft Pierre-Yves Beaudouin <
> pierre.beaudo...@g
Not available in the Dutch iTunes Store...
> Op 28 okt. 2014 om 15:26 heeft Pierre-Yves Beaudouin
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> I'm happy to announce the release of Super Lachaise on the App Store. It's a
> free mobile app that help you during the visit of the Père Lachaise cemetery.
> This
I'm happy to announce the release of Super Lachaise on the App Store. It's
a free mobile app that help you during the visit of the Père Lachaise
cemetery. This is probably one of the firsts mobile apps to use Wikidata ;)
http://www.superlachaise.fr/
https://itunes.apple.com/fr/app/super-lachaise/i
Hoi,
I find it funny that you ask EXACTLY the right question but you get the
opposite answer; I do not care for the query language I care for it being
available. As a consequence millions of edits have been made. Consequently
this query tool is practical. I have been told that a layer on top of it
Gerard,
what is there practical about having a query language that 1) is not a
standard and never will be 2) is not supported by any other tool or
project and never will be?
I would understand this kind of reasoning coming from a hobbyist
project, but not from one claiming to be a global "free li
Hoi,
Query has been promised and unofficially we have it for a VERY long time..
It is called WDQ. it is used in many tools. The official query will only
provide a subset of functionality for quite some time as I understand it.
Practical cases in RDF for what by whom ? Wikidata is first and foremos
John, please see inline:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:39 AM, John Erling Blad wrote:
> The data model is close to RDF, but not quite. Statements in items are
> reified statements, etc. Technically it is semantic data, where RDF is
> one possible representaton.
>
Well it has been shown (in the paper
Break a leg, team!
L.
2014-10-28 7:23 GMT+01:00 Stryn :
> Great,
> Good luck!
>
> Stryn 🐼
> Sent from Windows Phone
>
> Lähettäjä: John Lewis
> Lähetetty: 28.10.2014 1:55
> Vastaanottaja: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Aihe: [Wikidata-l] Open Data Awards
>
>
Gerard,
what about query functionality for example? This has been long
promised but shows no real progress.
And why do you think practical cases cannot be implemented using RDF?
What is the justification for ignoring the whole standard and
implementation stack? What makes you think Wikidata can d
The data model is close to RDF, but not quite. Statements in items are
reified statements, etc. Technically it is semantic data, where RDF is
one possible representaton.
There was a decision choice to keep Mediawiki to ease reuse within the
Wikimedia sites, mostly so users could reuse their knowle
13 matches
Mail list logo
