-Original Message-
From: denny.vrande...@wikimedia.de
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Expiration date for data
We will have a time datatype, and every property is strongly typed. This
is also true for properties used as qualifiers.
Regarding the
Hi Denny -
Thanks for your reply and I am relieved. The design seems in the process of
walking towards looking quite alot like ISO Topic Maps, I must say, because
it designates no wall of separation between classes and topics. Today that
wall exists in SMW in the dichotomy of Category vs
Denny said:
But if you find a simpler, and more RDFish way to express the (below)
statement, please feel free to enlighten me. I would be indeed very
interested.
The population density of France, as of an 2012 estimate, is 116 per square
kilometer, according to the Bilan demographique 2010.
A
Denny said:
you forgot to add something like
France#Density:2012_pop_estimate_Bilan_2010 property Density .
No I did not forget anything, given the Density 'namespace' in the subobject
name.
IOW your triple merely restates what is discernible from the subobject name.
Maybe you should tell me what
. If
a distinction between nouns and adjectives is made, then one type + multiple
facets is necessary.
-Original Message-
From: John McClure [mailto:jmccl...@hypergrove.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 7:08 PM
To: Wikidata (E-mail)
Subject: [Wikidata-l] Namespace-based model
Denny said
: [Wikitech-l] Topic Maps
On 21/03/12 13:06, John McClure wrote:
(1) official ISO versions are purchaseable while unofficial
versions are
foss.
Ok, that's a pity. A standard that nobody can read is not so
helpful ...
We already had this issue with other ISO standards before. In the end,
people just
