Friedrich Röhrs wrote:
as far as I have understood Nadja Kutz and John McClure want the wikidata dev
team to somehow commit to using ISO topic maps for the classification of the
content of wikidata.
No that is not what I want the wikidata to do. please read all my postings to
this thread
John McClure wrote:
Nadja conflated our asking about ISO Topic Maps as a base design standard
with incorporating ALL ISO STANDARDS EVER PUBLISHED into the wikidata
database
OK what I have sofar understood is that the ISO has not (yet) published much
semantically structured content,
Mr. Denny Vandrecic, many thanks for your detailed answer. Let me try to
explain the open questions
I am not a lawyer, but I want to point out that there is a distinction
between Copyright and other IP protection. Whereas a text about the
classification of hammers may (and usually is)
P.S.
I think this has been suggested already but I am not sure - I think that one
should eventually think of allowing parallel classifications schemes at
wikidata. So one could have an ISO classification
AND a user made classification like similar to the one at megajoule.org.
Frankly speaking
the pywiki (see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.wikidata/910)
looks interesting. It seems Joan Creus is a very fast and active programmer:
https://www.google.de/search?q=joan+creus+pythonie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:de:officialclient=firefox-a
so i dare to say that it would
Von: Nadja Kutz na...@daytar.de
Datum: 14. Juni 2012 11:21:28 MESZ
An: Discussion list for the Wikidata project. wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Betreff: Re:Re: [[meta:wikitopics]] updated
Hello Evan Sherwin
We just had a discussion in this thread (see
http://article.gmane.org
John McClure wrote:
Of course, thanks for the pointer. Yes, I'd agree that 19788's ontology be
closely reviewed for inclusion. 19788:2 standardizes the Dublin Core
properties, the same I recommend for [[wikidata]] provenance data, the same
slated for the [[wikidata]] ontology. But more to
I meanwhile found a public accessible link to your publication:
http://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/yago-naga/yago/publications/aij.pdf in which you
write:
However, in contrast to the original YAGO, the methodology for building YAGO2
(and also maintaining it) is systematically designed top-down with
Hello Fabian,
Is it possible to briefly explain the major differences between
DBpedia and the Yago Knowledge graph?
what is the www conference ?
nad
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
The ISO Standard sounds very interesting, but the price is really a problem.
If I understand this correctly alone the basic quantities in cutting and
grinding part 3 are 66 CHF
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?ics1=01ics2=060ics3=csnumber=8055
which
Yury Katkov: As far as I know, sometimes thedrafts of ISO standards are
available for free. Is there a free draft version somewhere
One can get some text information within the ISO database, here is the
documentation:
Am 04.04.2012 um 10:18 schrieb Bináris:
Nadja,
2012/4/4 Nadja Kutz na...@daytar.de
I had to guess its functionality (since i couldnt find any documentation), so
my guesses might be wrong:
one can list on that my watchlist wikimedia pages, by their titles, i.e.
by editing the my
12 matches
Mail list logo
