Re: [Wikidata-l] Namespace-based model

2012-04-05 Thread John McClure
deed necessary. If a distinction between nouns and adjectives is made, then one type + multiple facets is necessary. -Original Message- From: John McClure [mailto:jmccl...@hypergrove.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 7:08 PM To: Wikidata (E-mail) Subject: [Wikidata-l] Namespace-b

[Wikidata-l] Namespace-based model

2012-04-05 Thread John McClure
Denny said: I think the assumption everything has exactly one type is oversimplifying The assumption that everything is of multiple types is over-complicating. Usually you can tell from the first sentence in the Wikipedia page. "Tuesday is a day of the week" "Love is an emotion" "(Roman) Catholic

Re: [Wikidata-l] Namespace-based model

2012-04-05 Thread Denny Vrandečić
John, your suggestion has two requirements that I think are hard to achieve: * first, we need an agreement on the set of (non-overlapping but complete) types that exist in the world * second, we would need to assume that the Wikidata editors would agree on one and exactly one type for every item,

[Wikidata-l] Namespace-based model

2012-04-05 Thread John McClure
Wiki namespaces are currently so underused people may not realize their importance: they provide crucial semantic information. For instance, consider the example given in Wikidata's data model article[1] "Obama was US Senator from Illinois from January 3, 2005 to November 16, 2008" which yielded