Yeah, you're right, I'm pretty sure Lydia has something to hide ... It must
be a smokescreen.
Ot maybe it's throwing a bone to Gerard such that Gerard has a bone to
grumble to ;)
Seriously, I'd also like queries to be ready, but I'm pretty sure Lydia and
the devteam are doing their best. No
Hello everyone,
Sure: Reasonator is a great example, but converting the whole code is taking
more time then making new stuff. You just can't intergrate it.
Greetings,
Sjoerd de Bruin
sjoerddebr...@me.com
Op 30 dec. 2014, om 16:31 heeft Thomas Douillard thomas.douill...@gmail.com
het
Hoi,
What is your point ? Converting code ... it is about functionality.
Functionality can be re-implemented. While we are waiting for that, we do
not have to wait. Why should we ? What is achieved in that way ??
We certainly do not need to be in denial that query was announced more than
a year
Hoi,
With all due respect. We have something that works already in Reasonator.
It covers most if not all requirements that we can possibly think of. We
have gained a lot of experience in that way.. Why not implement it and
improve on it conform any potential additional requirements ?
Thanks,
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Daniel Kinzler
daniel.kinz...@wikimedia.de wrote:
The problem is that we don't really know what topic the user is looking for,
we
just know a term (the search string or page title). The easiest thin to do
would
be to show an automatic disambiguation page,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
With all due respect. We have something that works already in Reasonator. It
covers most if not all requirements that we can possibly think of. We have
gained a lot of experience in that way.. Why not
Hoi,
Our aim is to share in the sum of all knowledge. While building on top of
what Reasonator offers makes sense, Reasonator works now.
So yes, do have a look at what it is missing and what could be improved but
do not let that notion prevent us from sharing in the sum of all knowledge
that is
Hi,
Wiadomość napisana przez Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com w dniu
30 gru 2014, o godz. 10:24:
Reasonator works now.
Yes, but the thing is that putting anything on production is not just including
it there.
The whole code needs to be reviewed and there are some limitations,
Hoi,
They are mostly excuses. The software has been in use for a LONG time. It
is known for its relevance for the same long time.. So the value of this
need is diminished by the lack of attention in the past.
The point is that these excuses are very much in the way of us achieving
our goal..
Hoi,
You also forget that it HAS been in use on several Wikipedias in the past.
So when that was no problem why is it a problem that can not be overcome
now and for now?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 December 2014 at 12:15, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
They are mostly
Hi Gerard, I like Reasonator a lot, but there is several advantages to an
integrated solution :
* We can reuse technologies of the mediawiki ecosystem, like for example a
very important one : templates, that are already used an that a lot of
wikimedians knows. It can be used to build template
Hoi,
One of the requisites as mentioned on the page by Lydia is that it is
usable on any and all projects. Relying on local only technoloy like
templates do not make sense.
Reasonator DOES provide functionality that is similar to what can be
achieved with templating. When a person has relatives,
Do you speak for the community ??
Nope, I speak for myself. Nether told anything else.
Do you really know what Reasonator is about ?
I don't really appreciate the tone, I think reasonator is really cool and
I'm probably one of the people who pushed its use the most in Wikidata. Do
you have a
Hey folks :)
People have been bugging me for a while now about this so I started a
page to gather input.
If you are searching for a topic on a Wikipedia for example but it
doesn't have an article about it then we can look at Wikidata and see
if there is a matching item for that topic. If we have
The problem is that we don't really know what topic the user is looking for, we
just know a term (the search string or page title). The easiest thin to do would
be to show an automatic disambiguation page, listing items that have a matching
label or alias. That page would show the description for
15 matches
Mail list logo
