On 01/09/2015 09:26, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
On 01.09.2015 05:17, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I would have thought that the correct approach would be to encode these
values as gYear, and just record the four-digit year.
While we do have a ticket for that
On 01.09.2015 05:17, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I would have thought that the correct approach would be to encode these
values as gYear, and just record the four-digit year.
While we do have a ticket for that
(https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T92009) it's not that simple since
many triple
On 01.09.2015 16:57, Thiemo Mättig wrote:
Hi,
> I now identified another format for API warnings [...] from action
"watch"
I'm not absolutely sure, but I think this is not really an other format.
The "warnings" field contains a list of modules. For each module you can
either have a list of
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Markus Krötzsch <
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> I now identified another format for API warnings.
Obviously such variability in error reporting is going to cause consumers
of the API aggravation. Perhaps a single, consistent reporting style could
be
I now identified another format for API warnings. For example, I got the
following from action "watch":
"warnings": {
"watch": {
"*": "The title parameter has been deprecated."
}
}
For comparison, here is again what I got from wbeditentity:
"warnings" :
