Hello,
I would like to know if you are interested by the proposal I made at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/WDQS_On_FoundationDB Like I said previously on wikidata mailing list, I can address the following problems related to WDQS: In an ideal world, WDQS should: * scale in terms of data size * scale in terms of number of edits * have low update latency * expose a SPARQL endpoint for queries * allow anyone to run any queries on the public WDQS endpoint * provide great query performance * provide a high level of availability ref: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata/2019-June/013124.html The other proposal I made is about replacing both wikibase and blazegraph: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Iamamz3/Prototype_A_Scalable_WikiData nomunofu is a working prototype I made to micro benchmark (again) GNU Guile: https://github.com/amirouche/nomunofu What do you think? _______________________________________________ Wikidata-tech mailing list Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
