Hi Claudia
,
you wrote:
> We had a discussion about tools that allow for creating ontologies
> (or at least structured vocabularies) collaboratively in the context
> of terminology curation in the biological domain.
>
> Some people were in favor for Semantic MediaWiki, which made me
> wonder if t
Hi Denny,
I contacted him separately (just to make sure that he gets the question) and
share the results.
Claudia
> On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:28, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>
> No, wouldn't know of any. Wikibase is still rather new in this field, and to
> the best of my knowledge there has been no e
Thanks Gregor. I will add this to my list.
Btw, I will distill all information and will share in a separate email.
So far, I am overwhelmed by all responses - great.
Claudia
> On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:31, Gregor Hagedorn
> wrote:
>
> Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT
Chris Mungall & co were just awarded a grant to develop tooling for mere
mortals to create ontologies.
Copying him in here to comment.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Denny Vrandečić
wrote:
> I don't know if Jakob Voss is on this list, but he had a recent paper on
> using Wikidata (not Wikibase
I don't know if Jakob Voss is on this list, but he had a recent paper on
using Wikidata (not Wikibase) for NKOS terminology.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM Gregor Hagedorn <
gregor.haged...@mfn-berlin.de> wrote:
> Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from 2013:
> http
Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from 2013:
http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862
https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.php/tdwg/2013/paper/view/545
creating this SMW wiki:
http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/
(with a SKOS vocab management system)
My own assessment: there are s
No, wouldn't know of any. Wikibase is still rather new in this field, and
to the best of my knowledge there has been no evaluation of the two for the
task of collaborative vocabulary management.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:20 PM Claudia Müller-Birn
wrote:
> Dear Denny,
>
> Thanks for the pointers,
Dear Denny,
Thanks for the pointers, some of them are surprisingly new to me. However, I
was wondering if there are articles that especially compared Wikibase and
Semantic MediaWiki. Any idea?
Many thanks.
Claudia
> On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:05, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>
> SMW has been used succ
SMW has been used successfully in the past for such projects, indeed has
been developed with that in mind. A few papers here:
http://www.semantic-cora.org/index.php/Publications_and_Talks
http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Frank_Dengler/Publikationen/en
https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view
Dear Nemo,
Great. Thank you. I will check this out and get back to you with questions
(especially regarding the organisational setup) :)
Best,
Claudia
> On 12 Oct 2016, at 21:54, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
>
> Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11:
>> wonder if there are other projects than
Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11:
wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase for
structuring their data
http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on
http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have questions.
Nem
11 matches
Mail list logo
