Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively
Hi Denny, I contacted him separately (just to make sure that he gets the question) and share the results. Claudia > On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:28, Denny Vrandečićwrote: > > No, wouldn't know of any. Wikibase is still rather new in this field, and to > the best of my knowledge there has been no evaluation of the two for the task > of collaborative vocabulary management. > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:20 PM Claudia Müller-Birn > wrote: > Dear Denny, > > Thanks for the pointers, some of them are surprisingly new to me. However, I > was wondering if there are articles that especially compared Wikibase and > Semantic MediaWiki. Any idea? > > Many thanks. > > Claudia > > > On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:05, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > > > > SMW has been used successfully in the past for such projects, indeed has > > been developed with that in mind. A few papers here: > > > > http://www.semantic-cora.org/index.php/Publications_and_Talks > > > > http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Frank_Dengler/Publikationen/en > > > > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation=en=PdsmmEkJ_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C > > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation=en=PdsmmEkJ_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC > > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation=en=PdsmmEkJ_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:Tyk-4Ss8FVUC > > > > https://km.aifb.kit.edu/ws/ckc2007/accepted.htm#papers > > > > But these are just a few pointers, and I am sure it is quite out of that by > > now. > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:54 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) > > wrote: > > Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11: > > > wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase > > > for structuring their data > > > > http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on > > http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have questions. > > > > Nemo > > > > ___ > > Wikidata mailing list > > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > ___ > > Wikidata mailing list > > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > ___ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > ___ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively
Thanks Gregor. I will add this to my list. Btw, I will distill all information and will share in a separate email. So far, I am overwhelmed by all responses - great. Claudia > On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:31, Gregor Hagedorn> wrote: > > Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from 2013: > http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862 > https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.php/tdwg/2013/paper/view/545 > creating this SMW wiki: > http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/ > (with a SKOS vocab management system) > > My own assessment: there are serious limitation in SMW, which can be worked > with (e.g. we use an in-wiki xslt script to post-process), but having a more > powerful system like wikidata would be most welcome. > > However, to my present knowledge, the wikidata/wikibase based system would > have to have a custom programmed user interface to make it usable, something > the great semantic form extensions in SMW already make possible. > > Best > > gregor > > ___ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively
Chris Mungall & co were just awarded a grant to develop tooling for mere mortals to create ontologies. Copying him in here to comment. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Denny Vrandečićwrote: > I don't know if Jakob Voss is on this list, but he had a recent paper on > using Wikidata (not Wikibase) for NKOS terminology. > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM Gregor Hagedorn < > gregor.haged...@mfn-berlin.de> wrote: > >> Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from >> 2013: >> http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862 >> https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.php/tdwg/2013/paper/view/545 >> creating this SMW wiki: >> http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/ >> (with a SKOS vocab management system) >> >> My own assessment: there are serious limitation in SMW, which can be >> worked with (e.g. we use an in-wiki xslt script to post-process), but >> having a more powerful system like wikidata would be most welcome. >> >> However, to my present knowledge, the wikidata/wikibase based system >> would have to have a custom programmed user interface to make it usable, >> something the great semantic form extensions in SMW already make possible. >> >> Best >> >> gregor >> >> ___ >> Wikidata mailing list >> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> > > ___ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > -- -- mcmurry.ju...@gmail.com +1 805 455 5877 skype: mcmurry.julie git: jmcmurry -- ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively
I don't know if Jakob Voss is on this list, but he had a recent paper on using Wikidata (not Wikibase) for NKOS terminology. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM Gregor Hagedorn < gregor.haged...@mfn-berlin.de> wrote: > Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from 2013: > http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862 > https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.php/tdwg/2013/paper/view/545 > creating this SMW wiki: > http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/ > (with a SKOS vocab management system) > > My own assessment: there are serious limitation in SMW, which can be > worked with (e.g. we use an in-wiki xslt script to post-process), but > having a more powerful system like wikidata would be most welcome. > > However, to my present knowledge, the wikidata/wikibase based system would > have to have a custom programmed user interface to make it usable, > something the great semantic form extensions in SMW already make possible. > > Best > > gregor > > ___ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively
Here some old pointers to our TDWG - biodiversity - ViBRANT work from 2013: http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862 https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.php/tdwg/2013/paper/view/545 creating this SMW wiki: http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/ (with a SKOS vocab management system) My own assessment: there are serious limitation in SMW, which can be worked with (e.g. we use an in-wiki xslt script to post-process), but having a more powerful system like wikidata would be most welcome. However, to my present knowledge, the wikidata/wikibase based system would have to have a custom programmed user interface to make it usable, something the great semantic form extensions in SMW already make possible. Best gregor ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively
No, wouldn't know of any. Wikibase is still rather new in this field, and to the best of my knowledge there has been no evaluation of the two for the task of collaborative vocabulary management. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:20 PM Claudia Müller-Birnwrote: > Dear Denny, > > Thanks for the pointers, some of them are surprisingly new to me. However, > I was wondering if there are articles that especially compared Wikibase and > Semantic MediaWiki. Any idea? > > Many thanks. > > Claudia > > > On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:05, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > > > > SMW has been used successfully in the past for such projects, indeed has > been developed with that in mind. A few papers here: > > > > http://www.semantic-cora.org/index.php/Publications_and_Talks > > > > http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Frank_Dengler/Publikationen/en > > > > > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation=en=PdsmmEkJ_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C > > > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation=en=PdsmmEkJ_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC > > > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation=en=PdsmmEkJ_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:Tyk-4Ss8FVUC > > > > https://km.aifb.kit.edu/ws/ckc2007/accepted.htm#papers > > > > But these are just a few pointers, and I am sure it is quite out of that > by now. > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:54 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) < > nemow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11: > > > wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using > Wikibase for structuring their data > > > > http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on > > http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have > questions. > > > > Nemo > > > > ___ > > Wikidata mailing list > > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > ___ > > Wikidata mailing list > > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > ___ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively
Dear Denny, Thanks for the pointers, some of them are surprisingly new to me. However, I was wondering if there are articles that especially compared Wikibase and Semantic MediaWiki. Any idea? Many thanks. Claudia > On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:05, Denny Vrandečićwrote: > > SMW has been used successfully in the past for such projects, indeed has been > developed with that in mind. A few papers here: > > http://www.semantic-cora.org/index.php/Publications_and_Talks > > http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Frank_Dengler/Publikationen/en > > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation=en=PdsmmEkJ_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C > > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation=en=PdsmmEkJ_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC > > https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation=en=PdsmmEkJ_for_view=PdsmmEkJ:Tyk-4Ss8FVUC > > > https://km.aifb.kit.edu/ws/ckc2007/accepted.htm#papers > > But these are just a few pointers, and I am sure it is quite out of that by > now. > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:54 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) > wrote: > Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11: > > wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase > > for structuring their data > > http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on > http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have questions. > > Nemo > > ___ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > ___ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Re: [Wikidata] Using wikibase for creating structured vocabularies collaboratively
Claudia Müller-Birn, 12/10/2016 21:11: wonder if there are other projects than Wikidata that are using Wikibase for structuring their data http://www.eagle-network.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page , as documented on http://wikiba.se/projects/ . You can ask on this list if you have questions. Nemo ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata