http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/06/19/us/AP-US-Internet-Background-Checks.html
New employees, and perhaps current ones (?), are being asked to provide
details of all web-based accounts, including forums and social networking
sites. Details are meant to include usernames and passwords. Maybe
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
[The city] says it won't hold it against anyone for refusing to provide
it.
If it's not compulsory, I don't see a problem, as long as that fact is
made clear to people. I don't see the point in asking if it isn't
Thinking on Emily's point about social interaction on wikipedia, I'm well aware
that the amount of interaction that I have with other editors varies
dramatically depending on the areas of the Wiki that I spend time in.
At one extreme reviewing at [[wp:FAC]] is very interactive and in my
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/6/19 Nathan nawr...@gmail.com:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/06/19/us/AP-US-Internet-Background-Checks.html
New employees, and perhaps current ones (?), are being asked to provide
details of all web-based accounts, including forums and social networking
Not exactly a userbox, but I did see a bumper sticker that said
{{fact}} on it once :-)
___
philippe
[[en:User:Philippe]]
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:41 PM, stevertigo wrote:
I myself am wondering if anyone has seen any userboxes made into
bumperstickers.
I doubt it'll last. The ACLU is correct on the page when they say I
liken it to them saying they want to look at your love letters and
your family photos, it's just excessive. It's also largely against
the TOS for most of these sites. It's an interesting view at the sort
of importance and clout
At one extreme reviewing at [[wp:FAC]] is very interactive and in my
experience usually very collegial.
At the other extreme, when I'm feeling less sociable I find I can
while away hours eradicating preforming from the entertainment
industry or removing a surplus s to merge the Olympic
Varies from project to project over time. Some are quite collaborative
others more stick to highlighting weak points and standardisation.
I guess whatever floats their boat is what's best for them.
I notice, from time to time, that some wikiprojects I run across have
become inactive. It's
On WikiProjects: The performance of collaboration projects varies almost as
drastically as does the quality of Wikipedia's articles. At some ends, we
have some quite impressive organisations - such as WProj Military history -
that are very hands-on. At others, there are some quite useless projects
Siobhan Hansa wrote:
Amory Meltzer wrote:
I doubt it'll last. The ACLU is correct on the page when they say I
liken it to them saying they want to look at your love letters and
your family photos, it's just excessive. It's also largely against
the TOS for most of these sites.
2009/6/19 Emily Monroe bluecalioc...@me.com:
Varies from project to project over time. Some are quite collaborative
others more stick to highlighting weak points and standardisation.
I guess whatever floats their boat is what's best for them.
I notice, from time to time, that some
Varies from project to project over time. Some are quite collaborative
others more stick to highlighting weak points and standardisation.
I guess whatever floats their boat is what's best for them.
I notice, from time to time, that some wikiprojects I run across have
become inactive. It's
12 matches
Mail list logo
