Ladies and Gentlemen,
As you may be aware, there is concern that the sitenotices regarding
submission of candidacy for the Board of Trustees election were not
seen anywhere but Meta after the 11th of this month. Because of the
potentially massive consequence of this, and to encourage a
Regarding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:Wp_freedom_fighter ...
No response from gmail about why his e-mail is still functional.
The Apathy Cabal rules again.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing
2009/7/16 Jay Litwyn brewh...@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca:
Here is the simple way to explain why the answer to any paradox is no.
Can God crush an uncrushable stone?
If God exists, then the uncrushable stone does not.
If an uncrushable stone exists, then God does not.
Emacs can create a core
On 16/07/2009, Jay Litwyn brewh...@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca wrote:
Here is the simple way to explain why the answer to any paradox is no.
Can God crush an uncrushable stone?
If God exists, then the uncrushable stone does not.
If an uncrushable stone exists, then God does not.
___
I do not
Your belief in something however does not effect it's own existence.
However I have a new twist on this old issue.
Given: God can do anything
Assume: God creates an object which can do more things than God
Explain: Why this fallacy is a logical violation.
Second new twist
Given: God can
On 17 Jul 2009 17:47:49 -0400, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
{{fact}}
Can we have a naval-gazing article on the history of the policy??
Perhaps we'd be able to address questions of how it came to be.
Contact the United States Naval Observatory and get somebody there to
write one.
On Fri, 17 Jul
Of course we'd have to have a community consensus that no person with
tools could edit the meta articles, since we'd be trying to present the actual
history of the project, including all the warts. Problematic. Of course
it may collect all the troublesome persons into one area, so perhaps
2009/7/19 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/20/arts/20funny.html
One error on licensing. Claim that Wikipedia requires you to give up
your copyright unchallenged. Otherwise, pretty good! And should have
the right effect in terms of promo photo donations.
- d.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:06 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
Why would Google care about our internal issues?
I would assume because he was using a gmail e-mail address, maybe
something the user was doing was against google's TOS?
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
