On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Thomas Larsenlarsen.thoma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The current ref.../ref...references/ system produces nice
references, but it is flawed--all the text contained in a given
reference appears in the text that the reference is linked from. For
example:
It
I just today noticed a new interesting thing while doing a Google search.
Under each result there is a cloud looking thing and if you hover it it
says Comment. So I tried it.
Would someone else try this Google search
arsenic and old lace youtube
Just like that with the quotes and
Nope, no comments shown. If you click on the See all notes for this
SearchWiki button below the results, it says no public notes have
been made for the search results for [arsenic and old lace youtube].
What's a SearchWiki?
Nathan
___
WikiEN-l mailing
2009/9/2 wjhon...@aol.com:
To make this thread on-topic, I wonder if there would be any advantage is
allowing comments, separate from Talk Page comments, on our articles?
I notice that many casual readers will leave comments which you can
generally spot as they are not-tagged-with-a-sig
Minivan News, an independent article on the Maldives, has published
accusations that a PR company whitewashed an article on the Maldives.
A data-mining tool called WikiScanner http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/ has
purportedly revealed PR firm Hill Knowlton deleted a number of statements
critical of
2009/9/2 Keith Old keith...@gmail.com:
(More in article)
I think you forgot the link to the article. ;)
--
Regards,
Isabell Long. isabell...@gmail.com
[[User:Isabell121]] on all public Wikimedia projects.
Freenode Community Co-Ordinator - issyl0 on irc.freenode.net
PGP Key ID: 0xB6CA6840
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Isabell Long isabell...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/2 Keith Old keith...@gmail.com:
(More in article)
I think you forgot the link to the article. ;)
--
Regards,
Isabell Long. isabell...@gmail.com
[[User:Isabell121]] on all public Wikimedia projects.
Regardless of the truth, reliance on reliable published sources should
resolve most of these charges and countercharges. That is what we expect
of a public relations firm, both that they identify their purpose in
editing and cite appropriate sources.
Fred
Minivan News, an independent article
The material that was removed seems to have been in need of sourcing
and rewriting to a NPOV (whatever the truth of the matter may be). The
present article says very little of any sort, has over-emphasis on
two riots, and skips the period from 2004 to 2008, The other articles
on these islands
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:01 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I just today noticed a new interesting thing while doing a Google search.
Under each result there is a cloud looking thing and if you hover it it
says Comment. So I tried it.
In the Google search settings page, I followed a learn
I notice the button to submit a comment is labelled Make a public
comment; confusing!
Maybe what they mean is Make a comment, generic member of the public.
Emily
On Sep 2, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Luna wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:01 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I just today noticed a new
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:07 AM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. Wikinews does this - they have a collaboration page for editors
working on the article, but a comment page specifically for readers
to spout forth. Would be good.
Yes, there's no good reason we should subject casual
I think I like Comment on this page at the bottom, but I'm hesitant
to endorse that creating a section on the discussion (Talk) page. I
have a reason for my hesitation.
Sometimes readers comments on say Patty Hearst might be something
like Oh I remember when this occurred, I was in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
