This thread may turn out to be of interest to participants here:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-September/055352.html
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
stevertigo wrote:
Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I believe you are misreading what is said here. It is not being stated
that Arbcom has no time to do the job. Rather, it is being stated that
if it wants to do the job, it doesn't also have the time to deal with
all
Congratulations! And thanks for your dedication to the project. You
realize when he turns thirteen he's going to die of embarrassment over
this...?
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Sage Ross
ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.comragesoss%2bwikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:12 PM,
On Sep 28, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Philippe Beaudette wrote:
IRC office hours for the strategy project are upon us again Our
next office hours will be: 20:00-21:00 UTC, Tuesday 29 September.
Local timezones can be checked at
2009/9/28 Durova nadezhda.dur...@gmail.com:
Congratulations! And thanks for your dedication to the project. You
realize when he turns thirteen he's going to die of embarrassment over
this...?
Only if he hasn't made admin yet.
- d.
___
WikiEN-l
stevertigo wrote:
More thing on my to-do list: Get Arbcom to actually deal with
adjudicating policy and sections therein.
That can't work without opening up the broader question of how policies
are formulated and later amended. Any kind of policy review process
needs to operate
Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
The distinction between using reliable sources and using source
reliably is not likely to be productive.
If a fundamental editorial foundation is flawed because of
subjectivity is in the mix, that means we need to reformulate the
mixture. The Titanic
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
George Herbert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a mailing list for block reviews, this isn't it. We also
don't usually get into discussing specific content issues here
Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
Original research perhaps; disruption perhaps, but it is dishonest to
call it intellectual support of holocaust denialists.
I already took George to the woodshed for that remark, Raymond. I'm
sure he doesn't like being reminded of that experience.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Durova nadezhda.dur...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations! And thanks for your dedication to the project. You
realize when he turns thirteen he's going to die of embarrassment over
this...?
That's the idea. We're stocking up on embarrassing things we can
Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote to Ray:
This is an amazing thing you've written. I've read your posts for
perhaps two years, but I will read all future comments in an entirely
new light.
Well, I think what Ray is doing is trying to conceptualize a kind of
systemic bias in a certain historical
Ray Saintonge wrote:
stevertigo wrote:
More thing on my to-do list: Get Arbcom to actually deal with
adjudicating policy and sections therein.
That can't work without opening up the broader question of how policies
are formulated and later amended. Any kind of policy review
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:00 PM, stevertigo stv...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote to Ray:
This is an amazing thing you've written. I've read your posts for
perhaps two years, but I will read all future comments in an entirely
new light.
Well, I think what Ray is doing is
Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Your arguments focus on the definition and description of the
Holocaust as an event, not Holocaust denial as a phenomena. The
counter argument, which you've chosen to ignore, is that Holocaust
denial as a phenomena is nearly absolutely limited to the Jewish
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
George Herbert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a mailing list for block reviews, this isn't it. We also
(Previous post does not show text in archive)
From the article:
He is also known for his turbulent and controversial personal
life.[6] In 1969, his pregnant wife, Sharon Tate, was murdered by the
Manson Family, and in 1977, he was arrested in Los Angeles and pleaded
guilty to unlawful sexual
There will be a slight delay ...
- d.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org
Date: 2009/9/28
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Status of flagged protection (flagged
revisions) for English Wikipedia.
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
2009/9/28 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
OK, here's an old-style formulation: X is to current policy and
policy-review discussions as RfAr is to the Workshop. What would X be?
That's probably horribly accurate, considering the arbcom tends -
fairly reasonably - to regard
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
That's probably horribly accurate, considering the arbcom tends -
fairly reasonably - to regard the workshops as somewhere annoying
people go to be ignored ...
I know. AGF, srsly.
-Stevertigo
___
WikiEN-l
.) That was disappointing.
However, an interview with Bryan Crump on Radio New Zealand was just posted --
and its only up this week -- that I think was rather excellent. But it lasts 40
minutes, so perhaps that's why :).
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/nights/20090928
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I’ve added a couple quick notes to this affect on the main page:
http://flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
Ah, I didn't know about this. Having a quick look now. Comments:
- It looks like the UI could do with
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com
wrote: There is a page on the wiki collecting comments, please add
yours:
Done.
One thing that makes testing this thing quite difficult is that the
22 matches
Mail list logo
