Fred Bauder wrote:
Here's the question: If you can't tell it's PR, is there anything wrong
with it?
Dunno. Nothing wrong with it as PR, obviously, almost by definition. As
we know, what we can enforce (pretty much) is that people edit within
the rules; we cannot in any sense enforce the
On 04/02/2010 12:51 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
Here's the question: If you can't tell it's PR, is there anything wrong
with it?
Possibly, which is the problem. The main function of PR is to put the
best spin on things in a way that everybody accepts that as the truth.
By its nature, it's
I'm don't think that is always true which is what DGG was getting at. You
are right you CAN run the risk of them being so good that you can't tell
it's spin but to be honest you usually can in the wiki environment. A good
PR group is going to know that just getting a well written article on
