On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> When I look at an article as an ordinary reader looking for information
> I mostly don't notice if it has been referenced...
I fall into the category satirised by XKCD (though I can't find the
strip, unfortunately): if a sentence has a littl
On 11/04/11 8:45 AM, geni wrote:
> On 4 November 2011 14:24, Tony Sidaway wrote:
>> Harry Kroto.
>>
>> 'Kroto shared his views on what he calls the "GooYouWiki-Revolution"
>> and spoke highly of Wikipedia as a resource.
>> "In my field," said Kroto, "it's more reliable than the textbooks."'
>>
>>
On 11/04/11 11:24 PM, Carcharoth wrote:
> Thanks for that. And for looking into the history of that. The fact
> that the tag stayed there for so long doesn't surprise me at all. Most
> casual editors, if they don't know how the system works, will assume
> that someone else will deal with the tag an
