Re: [WikiEN-l] Guidelines on how much we take from a source?

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Bod Notbod wrote: > I decided I hadn't reviewed a featured article candidate for a while > and Russell T Davies (writer of the Doctor Who reboot) was there. > Figured I'd give it a go. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_T_Davies > > I invite you to look, with

Re: [WikiEN-l] Lobbyists and Wikipedia (again)

On 8 December 2011 19:00, Thomas Dalton wrote: > There is an excellent story on the BBC about this: > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16084861 > They've really understood our position on these matters. It looks like > David Gerard is responsible for helping them understand, so thank you > Da

Re: [WikiEN-l] Lobbyists and Wikipedia (again)

There is an excellent story on the BBC about this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16084861 They've really understood our position on these matters. It looks like David Gerard is responsible for helping them understand, so thank you David! ___ Wik

Re: [WikiEN-l] Guidelines on how much we take from a source?

> I decided I hadn't reviewed a featured article candidate for a while > and Russell T Davies (writer of the Doctor Who reboot) was there. > Figured I'd give it a go. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_T_Davies > > I invite you to look, with reasonable care, at references 1 to 97. > > Now, no

[WikiEN-l] Guidelines on how much we take from a source?

I decided I hadn't reviewed a featured article candidate for a while and Russell T Davies (writer of the Doctor Who reboot) was there. Figured I'd give it a go. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_T_Davies I invite you to look, with reasonable care, at references 1 to 97. Now, not only are they