I think there's a real risk here, to be even more blunt.
Calling it a trust system risks someone looking at a piece of text and
saying oh, look, this is trusted, so i can
-rely on this as advice before doing something dangerous/in making a
medical decision/etc
-use this as my sole source in
One issue that's bugged me for awhile wrt flagged revisions is whether
we'll have a problem with people saying that [[m:The Wrong Version]]
is still flagged, and theirs hasn't yet been. Granted, if this
becomes an issue, it can be easily enough solved by flagging the
current version (and, if
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Brianbrian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
What's interesting about WikiTrust is that a trust score is computed for
each individual. I wonder if these will be made public, and if so, how they
will change the community of editors. It seems likely that they will not
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Emily Monroebluecalioc...@me.com wrote:
Or perhaps it is a reputation score - my memory is fuzzy.
Either way, I would like the score to NOT be published. I'd hate to
have the community divided over a piece of software.
Emily
There's also the possibility for
