On Sunday, December 19, 2010, Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote:
> Should probably be København and not Křbenhavn
Thanks Martin, that's evidence that there are still bugs, and that Python's
Universal Encoding Detector is probabilistic!
___
WikiEN
On 17 December 2010 21:18, Joseph Reagle wrote:
> On Thursday, December 16, 2010, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
>> I have the first 10K edits up reconstructed in their various pages at:
>> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/~reagle/wp-redux/
>
> I fixed some of the encoding issues. The DB dump containe
On Thursday, December 16, 2010, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> I have the first 10K edits up reconstructed in their various pages at:
>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/~reagle/wp-redux/
I fixed some of the encoding issues. The DB dump contained different encodings.
So, the encoding of each diff in
>From the interpe...@nupedia.com log posted the other day, written by
Larry Sanger:
"Second, a little bit of history will help to explain this as well. I was
more or less offered the job of editing Nupedia when I was, as an ABD
philosophy graduate student, soliciting Jimbo's (and other friends')
On 16/12/2010 20:01, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Good news from Wiki-research-l in case you're not subscribed to it...
>
> Nemo
>
> Messaggio Originale
> Oggetto: Re: [Wiki-research-l] [WikiEN-l] Old Wikipedia backups discovered
> Data: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:53:14 -0500
> Da: Jos
Good news from Wiki-research-l in case you're not subscribed to it...
Nemo
Messaggio Originale
Oggetto: Re: [Wiki-research-l] [WikiEN-l] Old Wikipedia backups discovered
Data: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:53:14 -0500
Da: Joseph Reagle
I have the first 10K edits up reconstructed in thei
On 14 December 2010 22:02, Tim Starling wrote:
> him. Articles were created in the following order:
>
> * HomePage
> * WikiPedia
> * PhilosophyAndLogic
It's interesting to note our early priorities!
http://grey.colorado.edu/wikipedia_2001/979602227.txt
Two months later...
http://en.wikipedia.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
> HomePage
> * WikiPedia
> * PhilosophyAndLogic
> * UnitedStates
> * PopularMusic
> * SportS
> * MathematicsAndStatistics
> * CountriesOfTheWorld
> * AaA
> * AfghanistaN
> * UuU
> * TechnologY
> * ComputinG
> * ComputerSoftware
> * TransporT
>
I appreciate the challenge in getting old versions posted again. But I'm
also interested in the folks, rather more than in CamelCase and UseMod.
As I asked somewhere else recently, where are they now? I don't mean
outing people; just what do we really know about the Old Bolsheviks,
shot or not?
On 15/12/10 04:17, emijrp wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Thanks Tim. Congratulations.
>
> Is Wikipedia:UuU[1] now out-of-date?
Yes, the earliest surviving edit is now "This is the new WikiPedia!",
made to HomePage by office.bomis.com, presumably Jimmy. Larry signed a
comment a short time later from a differen
Would prefer on its own wiki as this is comprehensive up to a given date.
Maybe January2001.wikipedia.org -- immediate impact.
(DNS software cannot handle 2001.wikipedia.org)
FT2
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:04 PM, phoebe ayers wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Tim Starling
> wrote:
> >
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Tim Starling wrote:
> I was looking through some old files in our SourceForge project. I
> opened a file called wiki.tar.gz, and inside were three complete
> backups of the text of Wikipedia, from February, March and August 2001!
>
> This is exciting, because there
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Tim Starling wrote:
> I was looking through some old files in our SourceForge project. I
> opened a file called wiki.tar.gz, and inside were three complete
> backups of the text of Wikipedia, from February, March and August 2001!
>
> This is exciting, because there
Hi;
Thanks Tim. Congratulations.
Is Wikipedia:UuU[1] now out-of-date?
Regards,
emijrp
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:UuU
2010/12/14 Tim Starling
> I was looking through some old files in our SourceForge project. I
> opened a file called wiki.tar.gz, and inside were three complet
Deferring to tech views but I'd have thought "almost certainly not". There
may well be gaps after August 2001 for one thing; importing earlier records
would incorrectly imply a complete history was shown of user and page edits.
We probably could make a museum piece of them by creating "
January200
Can these edits be imported into wikipedia in time for the tenth anniversary?
I'm assuming some will relate to pages that have since been moved or
deleted so I appreciate this won't be an easy project.
WereSpielChequers
On 14 December 2010 16:16, Michael Snow wrote:
> On 12/14/2010 7:54 AM, Tim
On 12/14/2010 7:54 AM, Tim Starling wrote:
> I was looking through some old files in our SourceForge project. I
> opened a file called wiki.tar.gz, and inside were three complete
> backups of the text of Wikipedia, from February, March and August 2001!
I guess producing database dumps was easier in
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Tim Starling wrote:
> I was looking through some old files in our SourceForge project. I
> opened a file called wiki.tar.gz, and inside were three complete
> backups of the text of Wikipedia, from February, March and August 2001!
>
> This is exciting, because ther
18 matches
Mail list logo
