On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:30:06 -0700 (PDT), Bill Carter wrote:
Please ignore this Green Ink Day nonsense, and address the Alan
Cabal article that has been expunged from Wikipedia's mainspace to
its userspace for unjust reasons:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unlov
Please ignore this Green Ink Day nonsense, and address the Alan Cabal article
that has been expunged from Wikipedia's mainspace to its userspace for unjust
reasons:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_article
Bill
From:
2009/4/9 Bill Carter billdeancar...@yahoo.com:
Please ignore this Green Ink Day nonsense, and address the Alan Cabal article
that has been
expunged from Wikipedia's mainspace to its userspace for unjust reasons:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_article
...@dunelm.org.uk
To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 3:38:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Green Ink Day (stick to Alan Cabal)
2009/4/9 Bill Carter billdeancar...@yahoo.com:
Please ignore this Green Ink Day nonsense, and address the Alan Cabal article
that has been
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Bill Carter billdeancar...@yahoo.comwrote:
NOTE: The deletion review was actually held on March 30th to April 4th or
5th. You made an error. Furthermore, it was speedy deleted. You CANNOT
speedy delete an article with 40 fucking references. This is scandalous.
In a message dated 4/9/2009 2:05:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
sam.blacke...@googlemail.com writes:
The article was then created again, which made a clear case of speedy
deletion under criterion G4 (recreation of previously deleted material).
--
Provided the material is the
