On Conservapedia, a parodist came up with this template:
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template%3ANohearsayaction=historysubmitdiff=976114oldid=976104
Mr Schlafly approves:
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:CPalmercurid=72836diff=976121oldid=975547
- d.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:21 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Mr Schlafly approves:
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:CPalmercurid=72836diff=976121oldid=975547
Poe's law lives!
--
gwern
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
Conservapedia aren't a competitor. They aren't in remotely the same
business as us.
On Apr 19, 2012 11:22 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Conservapedia, a parodist came up with this template:
On 20 April 2012 00:36, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 19, 2012 11:22 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Conservapedia, a parodist came up with this template:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:58 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Their article on us is great, though:
http://conservapedia.com/Wikipedia
Wow, that's awesome - the whole introduction is gold. In fact, so much
to enjoy about that article - even the effect of scandals on
Wikipedia