[WikiEN-l] How our competitors are doing

2012-04-19 Thread David Gerard
On Conservapedia, a parodist came up with this template: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template%3ANohearsayaction=historysubmitdiff=976114oldid=976104 Mr Schlafly approves: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:CPalmercurid=72836diff=976121oldid=975547 - d.

Re: [WikiEN-l] How our competitors are doing

2012-04-19 Thread Gwern Branwen
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:21 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: Mr Schlafly approves: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:CPalmercurid=72836diff=976121oldid=975547 Poe's law lives! -- gwern ___ WikiEN-l mailing list

Re: [WikiEN-l] How our competitors are doing

2012-04-19 Thread Thomas Dalton
Conservapedia aren't a competitor. They aren't in remotely the same business as us. On Apr 19, 2012 11:22 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On Conservapedia, a parodist came up with this template:

Re: [WikiEN-l] How our competitors are doing

2012-04-19 Thread David Gerard
On 20 April 2012 00:36, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 19, 2012 11:22 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On Conservapedia, a parodist came up with this template:

Re: [WikiEN-l] How our competitors are doing

2012-04-19 Thread Steve Bennett
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:58 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: Their article on us is great, though: http://conservapedia.com/Wikipedia Wow, that's awesome - the whole introduction is gold. In fact, so much to enjoy about that article - even the effect of scandals on Wikipedia