Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-31 Thread Joe Anderson
On 2009-05-30 01:42:43 +0100, Stephanie Clarkson thesp...@sleepingcat.com said: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/29/wikipedia-bans-scientolog_n_208967.html Aside from the atrocious and misleading headline, I find it interesting that

Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-31 Thread Bryan Derksen
Joe Anderson wrote: The Register enjoyed calling ArbCom 'Wikicourt'. The Register article was written by Cade Metz, who has written extensively about Wikipedia before and for some reason goes out of his way to insult and misrepresent how things work here. This article contained a particularly

Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-31 Thread Charles Matthews
Bryan Derksen wrote: Calling Wikipedians 'cult-like' in the context of an article about Scientology, which is often considered as the prime exemplar of such things these days? :) It's a standard riff, in Wikicritic circles. Little evidence is typically adduced, about on the level of how

[WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-29 Thread Stephanie Clarkson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/29/wikipedia-bans-scientolog_n_208967.html Aside from the atrocious and misleading headline, I find it interesting that the Huffington Post published this, and that it is considered notable enough to get feature

Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-29 Thread David Gerard
2009/5/30 Stephanie Clarkson thesp...@sleepingcat.com: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/29/wikipedia-bans-scientolog_n_208967.html Aside from the atrocious and misleading headline, I find it interesting that the Huffington Post published this, and that it is considered notable enough to

Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-29 Thread Fred Bauder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/29/wikipedia-bans-scientolog_n_208967.html Aside from the atrocious and misleading headline, I find it interesting that the Huffington Post published this, and that it is considered notable enough to get

Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-29 Thread Stephanie Clarkson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fred Bauder wrote: Actually, pretty good, aside from the misleading headline. They not only quote from the decision, but actually link to it. Fred That was part of what interested me; the way that events on Wikipedia, and decisions made

Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-29 Thread Fred Bauder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fred Bauder wrote: Actually, pretty good, aside from the misleading headline. They not only quote from the decision, but actually link to it. Fred That was part of what interested me; the way that events on Wikipedia, and decisions made

Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-29 Thread Durova
Hm. 31K, start-class http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Western_thought 79K, featured: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_Simpson That probably explains it, Fred. -Durova On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site - Huffington Post

2009-05-29 Thread stevertigo
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Durova nadezhda.dur...@gmail.com wrote: Hm. 31K, start-class http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Western_thought 79K, featured: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_Simpson That probably explains it, Fred. -Durova Well, to be fair, history of Western