Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-26 Thread phoebe ayers
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@robla.net wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:15 PM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.comwrote: On further thought... what about Pending edits ? I do like pending as part of the name, especially if this is the name going on the UI for the

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-26 Thread Rob Lanphier
Hi Phoebe, Replies inline... On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:12 AM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@robla.net wrote: We're planning to change label of the Pending changes tab to Pending revision, since what people will see when they

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-25 Thread Andrew Gray
On 25 May 2010 02:33, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote: I also like Revision Review or Edit Review, though those could be interpreted as a review of something else, like all of the edits. Of those choices the former is alliterative, the second slightly less jargony. Interesting! My

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-25 Thread FT2
Edit review is not bad. FT2 On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.ukwrote: On 25 May 2010 02:33, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote: I also like Revision Review or Edit Review, though those could be interpreted as a review of something else, like all

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-25 Thread Emily Monroe
Interesting! My gut reaction was that revision is noticeably more jargony than edit. Yeah, I mean it even says in our motto, The encyclopedia that *anybody* can edit. Emily On May 25, 2010, at 4:12 AM, Andrew Gray wrote: On 25 May 2010 02:33, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-25 Thread stevertigo
Erik Zachte erikzac...@infodisiac.com wrote: Revision Review (or any similar term) clearly signals this is a human process, which IMHO gets it 80% right already. Review of a revision cue or edit cue works. You are right, as both words Flagged and Protections convey an autocratic sense. Note,

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-25 Thread Andrew Gray
On 25 May 2010 19:50, stevertigo stv...@gmail.com wrote: Erik Zachte erikzac...@infodisiac.com wrote: Revision Review (or any similar term) clearly signals this is a human process, which IMHO gets it 80% right already. Review of a revision cue or edit cue works. You are right, as both words

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-25 Thread phoebe ayers
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote: On 25 May 2010 02:33, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote: I also like Revision Review or Edit Review, though those could be interpreted as a review of something else, like all of the edits. Of those choices

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-25 Thread Rob Lanphier
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:15 PM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.comwrote: On further thought... what about Pending edits ? I do like pending as part of the name, especially if this is the name going on the UI for the link/tab/whatever where you would see them. It also seems to me that the

Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Renaming Flagged Protections

2010-05-24 Thread phoebe ayers
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hi everyone, As William alluded to, a bunch of us have been studying the user interface for Flagged Protections and figuring out how to make it more intuitive. Thanks for asking about the name -- though I suspect there's