2009/8/22 Emily Monroe bluecalioc...@me.com:
You may be too young to remember that it was the Homecoming Queen
whose Got A Gun I did it... for Johnny!
Yeah, I didn't get that at all.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8hxCpAdCJI
- d.
___
http://atomicprecision.wordpress.com/
http://atomicprecision.wordpress.com/about_aias/
So standard physics is a morasse of unprovable assumptions,
unobservables, and blatantly incorrect theory. By now it comes as no
surprise that wikipedia suppresses all the flaws. It is in the
interest of their
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 1:57 PM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
So standard physics is a morasse of unprovable assumptions,
unobservables, and blatantly incorrect theory. By now it comes as no
surprise that wikipedia suppresses all the flaws. It is in the
interest of their “moderators”
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Gwern Branwen gwe...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried this out the other day; it's a very cool idea, but by and
large, it seems that this hacker doesn't have enough CPU power to
extract the really good wikilinks, the ones that aren't already linked
inside the
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Gwern Branwen gwe...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried this out the other day; it's a very cool idea, but by and
large, it seems that this hacker doesn't have enough CPU power to
extract the
I have a feeling a lot of those are duplications of templates placed on a
page - Macbeth linking to Romeo and Juliet (and vice versa) was my first
example. Multiple search terms would seem to be the real place this would
be useful, to minimize crossover from templates.
~A
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009
Duplicating the function of templates - maybe not the best word to use. A
better one might be misinterpreting.
~A
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 14:36, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Amory Meltzer amorymelt...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have a feeling a lot of
In a message dated 8/22/2009 10:56:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
dger...@gmail.com writes:
Because there is no need to determine what the meaning of
the particular term or keyword is, the pages it returns generally deal
with the same concept or concepts that you entered. For instance, if
you
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Tony Sidawaytonysida...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/21 Tony Sidaway tonysida...@gmail.com:
On 8/19/09, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does anyone else get annoyed by certain
In a message dated 8/22/2009 12:42:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
carcharot...@googlemail.com writes:
*a département of France
*a French river
*a French city
*the French name for Vienna
-
The Council of Vienne.
Also apparently Vienne is a surname, I'm sure we can
None ever published have approached either our size or our
completeness. There is no experience, and no prior basis for public
acceptance or non-acceptance. We have made many assumptions about
what the public wants, but the public will want different things, and
why should we think we can
Perhaps the more rational approach is to do what our structure can
do well, and let other projects in the future try other ways and
other things and other goals.
I think this is a great idea.
Emily
On Aug 22, 2009, at 3:45 PM, David Goodman wrote:
Perhaps the more rational approach is
On 8/22/09, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Tony
But you've used a two-item disambiguation *hatnote*, whereas what
others (including me) would do is create a three-item disambiguation
page and link that from the top of the two items in question
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
carcharot...@googlemail.com writes:
*a département of France
*a French river
*a French city
*the French name for Vienna
-
The Council of Vienne.
Also apparently Vienne is a surname, I'm sure we can find SOME obscure
person
You are, I believe, thinking of Vierne.
Philippe
--Original Message--
From: Ray Saintonge
Sender: wikien-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
To: English Wikipedia
ReplyTo: English Wikipedia
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Annoying hatnotes
Sent: Aug 22, 2009 4:48 PM
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
pbeaude...@wikimedia.org wrote:
You are, I believe, thinking of Vierne.
Thanks. I figured it out afterwards, but too late.
Ec
The Council of Vienne.
Also apparently Vienne is a surname, I'm sure we can find SOME obscure
person named Vienne
I have a vague recollection of
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Tony Sidawaytonysida...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/22/09, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Tony
But you've used a two-item disambiguation *hatnote*, whereas what
others (including me) would do is create a three-item
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 9:19 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/22/2009 12:42:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
carcharot...@googlemail.com writes:
*a département of France
*a French river
*a French city
*the French name for Vienna
-
The Council of
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Carcharothcarcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
sniiip
Now I'm off to dump all this on Vienne (disambiguation) and then
I'll go and moan at WikiProject Disambiguation about how one can't be
expected go through all the 500+ links pointing at Vienne to see if
any
carcharot...@googlemail.com writes:
*a département of France
*a French river
*a French city
*the French name for Vienna
Shouldn't it be [[Vienne]]? With the lede starting out
'''Vienne''' (English spelling: Vienna), is a city...
A bit off topic, but I'd love to throw down and start an
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:43 AM, stevertigostv...@gmail.com wrote:
carcharot...@googlemail.com writes:
*a département of France
*a French river
*a French city
*the French name for Vienna
Shouldn't it be [[Vienne]]? With the lede starting out
'''Vienne''' (English spelling: Vienna), is a
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Carcharothcarcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Carcharothcarcharot...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Not sure whether to include all the of Vienne or de Vienne or not.
Perhaps on a separate page? Or altogether is probably fine.
Hmm.
Meanwhile, back on the English Wikipedia, a bot has added loads of
interwikis:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vienne_(disambiguation)diff=309530294oldid=309522639
I wonder if all those are correct or not?
Carcharoth
___
WikiEN-l
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Carcharothcarcharot...@googlemail.com
wrote:
And does Vienne actually mean anything in French? Google Translate
helpfully tells me that Vienne means Vienna (yes, we knew that
already).
Amongst possibly other things it's the
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 9:20 PM, genigeni...@gmail.com wrote:
Although we still haven't worked out what size people will general
accept as a fairly complete general encyclopedia.
I think if we had almost every article you would find in a *single
volume* encyclopedia up to featured or good
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Tony Sidawaytonysida...@gmail.com wrote:
Far worse than hatnotes, I'd say, are the ever-more-garish templates
we now use for matters such as tagging for NPOV, cleanup, and so on.
In my opinion we were better off when such templates produced a single
line of
In a message dated 8/22/2009 6:44:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
stv...@gmail.com writes:
How is it claimed that we are bound to English spelling only, and yet
permit all the Nordic, Germanic, and French characters* - few of which
most *English* speakers know the pronunciation of. (*?)
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Carcharothcarcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
Now I'm off to dump all this on Vienne (disambiguation) and then
I'll go and moan at WikiProject Disambiguation about how one can't be
expected go through all the 500+ links pointing at Vienne
Do we not have a tool
In a message dated 8/22/2009 8:04:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
carcharot...@googlemail.com writes:
Will, is this genealogy webpage reliable at all?
http://gilles.maillet.free.fr/histoire/famille_bourgogne/famille_vienne.htm
Well one thing I always caution
29 matches
Mail list logo
