http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wikipedia_is_a_mess_wikipedians_say_1_in_20_articl.php
Now, we have a lot of work to do, it's obviously encyclopedic and it
would be hard to get really wrong.
What needs to be in place to make it possible to recruit newbies for
the task of referencing things?
On 2 November 2011 21:07, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
What needs to be in place to make it possible to recruit newbies for
the task of referencing things? (Alleviate the citation syntax
problem.
I'm thinking that the problem here is inline references. An inline
reference is one
On 2 November 2011 22:38, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking that the problem here is inline references. An inline
reference is one where you plonk the reference in the middle of the text
reflots of stuff/ref. The problem with those is that they break up the
flow of the
Good.
Do it then.
On 2 November 2011 22:42, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 November 2011 22:38, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking that the problem here is inline references. An inline
reference is one where you plonk the reference in the middle of the