On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Daniel R. Tobias d...@tobias.name wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:25:31 + (GMT), Matthew Bowker wrote:
Even through all that, I believe AfC needs to exist. It does
provide a great service to anon editors who won't create accounts
for whatever reason.
Are
On 13 June 2012 14:14, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I ask because next Wednesday I will be the Wikipedian at an episode of
the CIPR TV webcast[1]. Basically a podcast with a camera. I have my
On 21 June 2012 11:53, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
(God I look my age. The ponytail is going!)
Mmm ... with Gemma Griffiths ... yes she beats you on hairdo.
Charles
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from
Not bad David!
I tend to take a bit more of a liberal guideline on fixing obvious
blatant vandalism: Google CEO Larry Page is a great big poopyhead
should be reverted no matter what, even if you have a conflict of
interest, or are Larry Page himself, and would have thought this is
generally
On 21 June 2012 12:35, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote:
Not bad David!
I tend to take a bit more of a liberal guideline on fixing obvious
blatant vandalism: Google CEO Larry Page is a great big poopyhead
should be reverted no matter what, even if you have a conflict of
On 21 June 2012 12:35, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote:
I tend to take a bit more of a liberal guideline on fixing obvious
blatant vandalism: Google CEO Larry Page is a great big poopyhead
should be reverted no matter what, even if you have a conflict of
interest, or are
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:35:43 +0200, Martijn Hoekstra wrote:
Google CEO Larry Page is a great big poopyhead
should be reverted no matter what
Even if you can find a Reliable Source [tm] for it?
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips:
Just a reminder that this will be happening in a few minutes.
Rob
From: Rob Schnautz
Subject: Office hour: Wikipedia Education Program
The Wikimedia Foundation staff for the Wikipedia Education Program (Frank
Schulenburg, Annie Lin, LiAnna Davis, Jami Mathewson, and I) will be hosting a
I've worked very often at CSD, but I have just now been taking a look
at AfC, in response to the messages about the backlog. It surprised me
initially to see that articles I would certainly have passed at speedy
were being declined there, I was going to post a complaint about it.
But then I
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:56 PM, David Goodman dgge...@gmail.com wrote:
I've worked very often at CSD, but I have just now been taking a look
at AfC, in response to the messages about the backlog. It surprised me
initially to see that articles I would certainly have passed at speedy
were being
Agreed. I did in fact have this in mind last night when I encountered
the problem.
But sometimes one does have to say this to a contributor. I
occasionally decline a speedy, and send it or AfD , with the reason
being some variant. of I think the community should decide this
one/. I have a good
I often find the problem here is explaining the difference what
processes are open to them, and that they are able to take those
processes to its end (reject PROD, go to AfD, take it to DRV), but
that it is an exceedingly bad idea, and they shouldn't do it. The lack
of hard rules combined with the
12 matches
Mail list logo
