On 23 May 2011 02:24, Brian J Mingus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure about the history of this article, but it it was recently
> brought to my attention via Facebook.
>
> My take on this article is that it is an abuse of Wikipedia's notability
> guidelines. The article goes out of its way to cit
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm not sure about the history of this article, but it it was recently
>> brought to my attention via Facebook.
>>
>> My take on this article is that it is an abuse of Wikipedia's notability
>> guidelines. The article goes out of
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure about the history of this article, but it it was recently
> brought to my attention via Facebook.
>
> My take on this article is that it is an abuse of Wikipedia's notability
> guidelines. The article goes out of its way to cite lots of sources, but
> I
> do not believe t
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Brian wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure about the history of this article, but it it was recently
> brought to my attention via Facebook.
>
> My take on this article is that it is an abuse of Wikipedia's notability
> guidelines. The article goes out of its way to
Hi all,
I'm not sure about the history of this article, but it it was recently
brought to my attention via Facebook.
My take on this article is that it is an abuse of Wikipedia's notability
guidelines. The article goes out of its way to cite lots of sources, but I
do not believe that being mentio
