This is a nicely competent paper. Thanks for the heads up! SJ
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Gwern Branwen wrote:
> http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~lam/papers/lam_group2010_wikipedia-group-decisions.pdf
> :
>
>> "We also found that there have been two bots (computer programs that edit
>> Wikip
Santorum isn't the only candidate who's had somebody try to use his
name as a word for something gross (though probably the most
successful example of it happening)... in a recent Cracked article:
"He wanted to be President Trump, even though "trump," as a word,
sounds like it should be slang f
On Thu, 26 May 2011, George Herbert wrote:
> In this particular, I am vexed and confused. If the longer article
> makes him look better, why in the flying spaghetti monster's name are
> those advocating human dignity here asking to shorten it?
The main negative effect of the article on Santorum i
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Brian J Mingus
> wrote:
>> This strikes me as indirection. If someone claims that an article is
>> biased
>> then they are also claiming that the process governing its creation is
>> biased. Such a claim is not a slur, it is a purported statement of
>> fact.
>> H
