Happy that that finally happened...
short, nevertheless still complete, that gives me quite a satisfactory
feeling while reading.
Petr [[u:Reo On]]
On 9/14/11, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
Today's featured article is all of 6 paragraphs long. Discuss.
Seems to be surprisingly common practice there...:
http://www.freelancer.com/search/wikipedia/
Petr [[u:Reo_On]]
On 9/16/11, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.comwrote:
FWIW, I've known the face-palm gesture for ages, and never knew it was
in any way related to Star Trek. I suspect our article on the topic
may be slightly over-egging things there. I've used and seen the
facepalm
for a political purpose, but just
to say that if the bill gets approved, wikipedia would not be useful
anymore, so it would have to die.
*
With regards
Petr Skupa [[User:Reo On]]
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Rob Schnautz bobthewikiped...@gmail.comwrote:
Woah. I just checked
to not rise the expectation after few first edits too high)
In sum, I believe more in slow start of newbies, because it is going to hurt
them less and it is going to let them get more of appreciation of their
work.
Petr Skupa [[u:Reo On]]
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Ron Ritzman ritz...@gmail.com
Not so bad idea,
I like the templates and those informations very much.
However, if such info could be on some third tab I might be happy.
regards
Petr Skupa [[u:Reo On]]
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Angela Anuszewski
angela.anuszew...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I've given up on talk
Ian Woollard:
do You know their motivation?
I see this oversensitivity to the external links in czech Wikipedia too. I
am not that much hurt by their removal, what is hurting me is that the
cleaners are sometimes treating (in my opinion) well-intentioned outsiders
as spammers.
Reo
On Wed, Oct
I don't know of any good
way in which to guide newcomers towards that direction, though,
especially in a come-and-go-type environment such as this.
When I came to Wikipedia, .. years back then.. I really liked the idea of
stubs being sorted by the field of interest. I liked it and started to
Really nice idea :). And it seems that the newbies love it!
Petr
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:19 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Howie Fung hf...@wikimedia.org
Date: 28 October 2011 01:42
Subject: [Foundation-l] Feedback Dashboard
Even so, the number is just awesome by itself.
1 000 000 I would never imagine to see such editcount!
Amazing.
Petr [[u:Reo On]] Skupa
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Phil Nash phn...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
A million? Personally, I prefer quality over quantity. He's not that good.
-
Dear Audrey
I only hope that we have provided you such an quality information on the
motivation of Wikipedians, you had expected, given that the readers of this
maillist are not necessarily just the most ordinary and so the most
representative users :).
I wish You good luck with your project
and
11 matches
Mail list logo
