*).
?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Richard Farmbrough
rich...@farmbrough.co.uk wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Most_missed_articles
On 08/03/2014 09:20, David Gerard wrote:
I recall finding a list somewhere of article titles that got lots of hits
but didn't have articles, but don't
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Most_missed_articles
On 08/03/2014 09:20, David Gerard wrote:
I recall finding a list somewhere of article titles that got lots of
hits but didn't have articles, but don't recall where. I may be
misremembering of course. - d.
Can a list admin please investigate why I'm not receiving anything from
this list?
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Merry Christmas to all our readers!
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I probably consult it every couple of weeks. Usually to check some
change hasn't been sneaked in, or for something that isn't covered. Or
because someone has told me I'm wrong.
It is a shame that it is such a battleground sometimes. But it's also a
shame that the basics aren't obvious to
However they will obviously enjoy the spoiler more, since the warning
has spoiled it.
On 12/08/2011 20:08, Ken Arromdee wrote:
The major fallacy here is that spoiler warnings are not the opposite of
spoilers. You can have a spoiler warning and a spoiler at the same time;
people who see the
Carry on as before, then?
On 25/06/2011 18:38, Fred Bauder wrote:
Naw, let's trick em. Let's pretend to be friendly and appreciative for at
least two years.
Fred
As long as we don't start giving newcomers a false sense of appreciation
or accomplishment, which will end up hurting them more
These images are created dynamically by the MediaWiki software. If you
go into your preferences you can set the MathML to always be displayed
as HTML. Alternatively you can use the edit page or the API.
All AIUI.
On 23/06/2011 22:13, priyank bagrecha wrote:
Hi
Do the latex equations
On 06/06/2011 20:59, David Gerard wrote:
On 6 June 2011 20:56, Fred Bauderfredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
And as usual, El Reg's coverage manages to be negative anyway. They
are truly a lesson to all of us. From
They completely miss the point, the average product a student creates
ends up in
Fred Bauder wrote:
The matter can be resolved by editing which conforms the article to
Wikipedia policies.
This is true, however it is also true the editing which conforms the
article to WP policies might fail to resolve the matter.
The revival of Gore Vidal's technique of some 50 years ago,
Presumably we are evaluating the arguments that are not /ad hominem /on
their merits, rather than on the /ad hominem/ basis that their author
elsewhere makes /ad hominem /attacks?
RMF
On 25/05/2011 22:38, David Gerard wrote:
See, at this point you completely blew your credibility in this
11 matches
Mail list logo
