On 09/16/11 10:35 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:
Nice to know we are as accurate and more up-to-date than the competition.
I'd love to see further work done on the 2% of information where we
currently differ from the textbooks, hopefully most of that will just be
that the textbooks are out of date.
On Sep 16, 2011 6:35 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
It is difficult to balance the needs of the general public, which reads
more at a 5th grade level than a 9th grade level, with the need to
present comprehensive information that would be of use to an oncologist.
If we
On Sep 16, 2011 6:35 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
It is difficult to balance the needs of the general public, which reads
more at a 5th grade level than a 9th grade level, with the need to
present comprehensive information that would be of use to an
oncologist.
If we
There is also the idea that the lead should be written for a more general
audience than the rest of the article. I don't know if our cancer articles
follow that style, but I find that in many articles in subjects where I'm an
ignoramus I can grasp the lead but get lost if I try to finish the page.
On 09/17/11 5:48 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011 6:35 PM, Fred Bauderfredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
It is difficult to balance the needs of the general public, which reads
more at a 5th grade level than a 9th grade level, with the need to
present comprehensive information that would be
On 16/09/2011 03:26, Tony Sidaway wrote:
It appears that a study by a team at the Medical School at Thomas Jefferson
University has found Wikipedia's cancer information to be very accurate and
updated more frequently than other sources. Compared to professional sources
such as PDQ, however,
On 16/09/2011 03:26, Tony Sidaway wrote:
It appears that a study by a team at the Medical School at Thomas
Jefferson
University has found Wikipedia's cancer information to be very accurate
and
updated more frequently than other sources. Compared to professional
sources
such as PDQ,
Nice to know we are as accurate and more up-to-date than the competition.
I'd love to see further work done on the 2% of information where we
currently differ from the textbooks, hopefully most of that will just be
that the textbooks are out of date. But it would be good to have that
confirmed and
Nice to know we are as accurate and more up-to-date than the competition.
I'd love to see further work done on the 2% of information where we
currently differ from the textbooks, hopefully most of that will just be
that the textbooks are out of date. But it would be good to have that
