On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Strange, I'd interpret it as Wikipedia will be ad-free forever. Now,
hand over the cash.
That's pretty much how I'd see it too. I would like to see WP ad-free
forever but it does seem a little unwise to tie your hands
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
The strategy process is still ongoing and there are a number of
proposals for adverts. I don't sense they're going to get any traction
this time. But if the WMF severely lacked funds in future years I
imagine everyone would
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
The strategy process is still ongoing and there are a number of
proposals for adverts. I don't sense they're going to get any traction
this time.
Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
That is really eye-catchingly different. One became 14 million. 270
languages is (superficially at least) also very impressive. I suppose
they might use the number of daily edits next as well.
Eh. If you came up with this one though, how much would
Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm not here to discuss the wording of the fundraising slogans yet
again, but this one screams legal trouble:
Wikipedia. Ad-free forever.
[Progress bar] [Donate now button]
I'd interpret this as if we reach $7.5M, Wikipedia will be ad-free
I'm not here to discuss the wording of the fundraising slogans yet
again, but this one screams legal trouble:
Wikipedia. Ad-free forever.
[Progress bar] [Donate now button]
I'd interpret this as if we reach $7.5M, Wikipedia will be ad-free
forever. I really wish that'd be the case, but if not,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm not here to discuss the wording of the fundraising slogans yet
again, but this one screams legal trouble:
Wikipedia. Ad-free forever.
[Progress bar] [Donate now button]
I'd interpret this as if we reach
