On 9 May 2011 04:38, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that it is still broken in the classic skin how about no.
I suspect that the remaining users of the classic skin do not
constitute an obvious and overwhelming veto.
I also suspect that anyone that interested in the classic skin is
going
On 9 May 2011 08:19, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 May 2011 04:38, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that it is still broken in the classic skin how about no.
I suspect that the remaining users of the classic skin do not
constitute an obvious and overwhelming veto.
I also
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect that the remaining users of the classic skin do not
constitute an obvious and overwhelming veto.
I also suspect that anyone that interested in the classic skin is
going to have to submit patches themselves.
Since
On 9 May 2011 09:56, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect that the remaining users of the classic skin do not
constitute an obvious and overwhelming veto.
I also suspect that anyone that interested in the classic
Hello all,
This is a heads-up that tomorrow, we're planning to deploy the Article
Feedback Tool, which is currently on 3,000 English Wikipedia articles,
to a larger set of 100,000 articles. This initial expansion is
intended to further assess both the value and the performance
characteristics of
On 9 May 2011 03:57, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello all,
This is a heads-up that tomorrow, we're planning to deploy the Article
Feedback Tool, which is currently on 3,000 English Wikipedia articles,
to a larger set of 100,000 articles. This initial expansion is
intended to
