On 04/16/2010 05:19 PM, David Gerard wrote:
And the Cuil search engine is still the shining example of why Cuil
Theory exists. It's comically awful and is most useful to point the
kids at and tell them Google got popular by not sucking like that.
It is true that failure is important to future
But it would seem the technology is still some way off.
I don't know. I think I have found a good use for it.
http://cpedia.com/search?q=wikipedia+talk
This way, I can monitor all the talk pages I usually watch without having to go
to them individually!
-- Shirik
I find Cpedia rather...hilarious, for some reason. I don't see the
point to it, otherwise.
Emily
On Apr 15, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Del Buono, Matthew Paul wrote:
But it would seem the technology is still some way off.
I don't know. I think I have found a good use for it.
On 16 April 2010 20:25, Emily Monroe bluecalioc...@me.com wrote:
I find Cpedia rather...hilarious, for some reason. I don't see the
point to it, otherwise.
You'll love this blog entry:
http://www.cuil.com/info/blog/2010/04/13/cpedia-and-its-detractors
He fails to realise the *only* people
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:07 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
You'll love this blog entry:
http://www.cuil.com/info/blog/2010/04/13/cpedia-and-its-detractors
He's not too far off the mark with some of his comments in that blog;
it's an unfortunate side effect of the style of
On 04/16/2010 03:09 PM, Nathan wrote:
http://www.cuil.com/info/blog/2010/04/13/cpedia-and-its-detractors
He's not too far off the mark with some of his comments in that blog;
it's an unfortunate side effect of the style of communication the
Internet encourages that experimentation
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:29 PM, William Pietri will...@scissor.com wrote:
I think there are ways to signal that you are doing something as an
experiment and with the requisite humility. A good example is Google
Sets, which is part of Google Labs:
http://labs.google.com/sets
One of their
On 17 April 2010 01:05, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
That is a fair and thoughtful indictment of their approach. I have no
particular problem with the other comments in this thread either --
they weren't all substantial criticism, but that's fine as far as it
goes. A lot of other
On 14 April 2010 13:00, wikien-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send WikiEN-l mailing list submissions to
wikie...@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
or, via email, send a
