SPAM
Compromised email account
On 11/10/2011 6:41 p.m., Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
http://94.76.215.106/~chevrole/catalog/site.php?html143
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
Likely. Spammed other mailing lists as well.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Alan Liefting alieft...@ihug.co.nzwrote:
SPAM
Compromised email account
On 11/10/2011 6:41 p.m., Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
http://94.76.215.106/~chevrole/catalog/site.php?html143
... written anything good on the encyclopedia lately?
- d.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
David Gerard wrote:
... written anything good on the encyclopedia lately?
- d.
I assume you're addressing this to those still able to do so. I, for my
part, am beavering away on Commons trying to sort out the mess that is
[[Category:Rivers of England]]. Category maintenance seems to be
... written anything good on the encyclopedia lately?
- d.
Well, yes,
I discovered the answer to the mystery of why Mao adopted Stalinism and
put it into History of the People's Republic of China (19491976)
A lot of people have wondered where he got those ideas. Turns out they
came from
If you're into mythology/cryptozoology, I did some translation from Old
Norse and Old Icelandic this summer to put together what is probably the
most complete syntheses (in any language) of [[Hafgufa]] and [[Lyngbakr]],
two legendary sea monsters.
Bob
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Fred
Pondering the utility of talk page edits recently, I've begun to
wonder: how many of our readers actually look at the talk page as
well? I know some writers writing articles on Wikipedia have mentioned
or rhapsodized at length on the interest of the talk pages for
articles, but they are rare birds
Hi everyone,
In the Community Dept. we've been collaborating with some Wikipedians to
continue one of the research projects from the summer, namely involving the
randomized testing of talk page templates to try and improve them. (If you
watch WP:VPT, then you might've seen our announcements.)
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:41 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
... written anything good on the encyclopedia lately?
- d.
Mostly cogent notices on talk pages, hoping that years from now somebody
with more in-subject expertice will address those concerns. Eventualism isn't
fun but it
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 16:15, Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Hi everyone,
In the Community Dept. we've been collaborating with some Wikipedians to
continue one of the research projects from the summer, namely involving the
randomized testing of talk page templates to try and
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Gwern Branwen gwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Pondering the utility of talk page edits recently, I've begun to
wonder: how many of our readers actually look at the talk page as
well? I know some writers writing articles on Wikipedia have mentioned
or rhapsodized at
11 matches
Mail list logo
